there are no good advisers on the site - page 4

[Nikolay Kositsin]

Mikalas:

Good afternoon, openlive!

(No laughing matter). In 2011 I wrote an EA for FOREX, which in the tester for 4 years in a row

gave an annual gain of ~472%. Putting it on a real account my "grail" SLILLED (luckily quite small)

deposit. I have a classmate who is a maths professor who raised me laughing when I asked for the reasons

of my loss, answering in a clear and simple way: "A function that is undefined always has a result less than 50%".

Not even 50/50! Then, after testing my Expert Advisor on 10 stories, it lost the deposit, confirming my friend's words.

FOREX is a kitchen where you cannot win with standard approaches (history analysis, indicators and other nonsense).

A strange conclusion! At the violin too, from most people's point of view, it is impossible to play! But they play it. Play! The conclusion is simply more accurate to the essence of the phenomenon that, perhaps, the violin is not an instrument for the individual in question.

[Alexander Shekhovtsov]

MLR:

What's there to laugh about. Really a grail, working on the pauses and do not use chips tester)) Selling for $ 5000 author - (for 1000 was a pity to sell)) here's the drawing

If you simplify it in a straight line, flatten it horizontally and stretch it vertically, it will correspond to main profitability criterion - angle of 45 degrees.

Here - closer to the grail - the angle is steeper

It's not much of a growth for opening orders "at opening prices".

To the author of this thread: I can give you some information. Get me on skype.

[Armen]

Stasikusssss:

)))) what does psychology have to do with it? it's the same tech analysis

and the "so called" news has nothing to do with it either, can't there be strong movements by themselves without news?

What about the trend, inertia, continuation of price movement?

[Роман]

Wex:

Some weak growth for opening orders "at opening prices".

To the author of this thread: I can tell you some information. Call me on Skype.

I'm just being modest).

I know you want to shove the same one into the author on Skype for 100 quid ! Just to steal money (.

[Armen]

Mikalas:

Good afternoon, openlive!

(No laughing matter). In 2011 I wrote an EA for FOREX, which in the tester for 4 years in a row

gave an annual gain of ~472%. Putting it on a real account my "grail" SLILLED (luckily quite small)

deposit. I have a classmate who is a maths professor who raised me laughing when I asked for the reasons

of my loss, answering in a clear and simple way: "A function that is undefined always has a result less than 50%".

Not even 50/50! Then, after testing my Expert Advisor on 10 stories, it lost the deposit, confirming my friend's words.

FOREX is a kitchen where you cannot win with standard approaches (history analysis, indicators and other nonsense).

And how, with such uncertainty, did he give a stable growth?

[Armen]

Wex:

Something of a weak growth for opening "opening prices" orders.

To the author of this thread: I can give you some information. Get me on skype.

Let's do it for everyone)

[Роман]

Mikalas:

FOREX is a kitchen where it is impossible to win with standard approaches (history analysis, indicators and other nonsense).

But is it possible to win at all? And with what approaches?

[Alexander Shekhovtsov]

MLR:

I'm just modest).

I know you want to Skype the author the same one for 100 quid! Just to get some money.

You really don't understand what the tester shows you by simulating the opening of pending orders (as well as the triggering of s/l) "at opening prices"? Or are you pretending not to understand?

[Mikhail Filimonov]

MLR:
Is it even possible to win? And with what approaches?

I don't know how on FOREX, I trade (not play) on FORTS.

[Yury Reshetov]

MLR:
Is it even possible to win? And with what approaches?

You can win at the casino if you are lucky.