Why have subscriptions been banned on the grounds of "too high a yield" ? - page 81
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
No, but they do not need to see. Sometimes one profitable month is enough for them to express their discontent. They can reveal the same pattern of profitable trades. But, you have to admit that in the case of an aggregator, it is much more difficult to do so.
Fuck those cans)). Instead of fixing their work to try to close those who have found holes in it. But in any case, such profits will not be tolerated for a long time and strategies where the liquidity provider loses will be shut down quickly.)
I sometimes wonder myself. It's more frustrating to lose clients' money than it is to lose your own, it makes your heart bleed.
Fuck those cans)). Instead of fixing their work to try to close those who have found holes in it. But in any case, such profits will not be tolerated for a long time and strategies with losing liquidity provider will be closed quickly).
If there are many suppliers and if lucrative toxic traffic is spread across them, you can work for a long time, maybe forever. Either way, there will always be more losers. If suddenly there are fewer of them, the banks will widen the spreads for everyone.
The banks are interested in the drain, we are interested in the profits.
However, it is strange, the Forex market is the international interbank foreign exchange market, banks exchange money and it is not profitable for them for private institutions which they serve to speculate profitably, but meanwhile the brokerage companies declare that they have found a workaround and it is profitable for them for the client to earn. How is this even possible?
Actually, it makes sense.
Then it is not clear why the banks don't benefit. They just get a commission as well.
Although it is understandable in general, the goal is to get money out of the masses, and profitable speculation takes that profit away from the banks on a regular basis. It makes sense to cut off such clients. And the brokerage company will not disguise anything there, skewed and all, so it is also unprofitable, unless we copy it.
They're just getting a commission too, aren't they?
Then it is not clear why the banks don't benefit. They also get a commission, after all.
They share the commission among themselves at best, and at worst all the profit comes straight out of their pockets
they divide the commission amongst themselves at best, and at worst all the profit comes straight out of their pockets
Well...
If you do not know what to do and you do not know how to do it, you may use an appropriate brokerage company that will take care of you and your brokerage company.