Why have subscriptions been banned on the grounds of "too high a yield" ? - page 75
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
is a picture of the trading of this test TS (which started this thread).
Looks like I'm an idiot.
;)
It would be cool if the platform had not just one glass, but from each supplier. The UST would be the UST. Transparent. And often the bid would be higher than the ask. Buy from one, sell to another immediately. And in general.
Dreams, dreams.
It would be cool if the platform had not just one glass, but from each supplier. The UST would be the UST. Transparent. And often the bid would be higher than the ask. Buy from one, sell to another immediately. And in general.
Dreams, dreams, dreams.
Would you open accounts with every vendor, too?
And the cost of transferring funds, there's no creeling between them.
would you put that on your account?
You can use it on two of your accounts, because the second one needs to be drained.
I know for sure that the demo account can be on a real server and look like a real account.
It would be cool if the platform had not just one glass, but from each supplier. The UST would be the UST. Transparent. And often the bid would be higher than the ask. Buy from one, sell to another immediately. And in general.
Ah, dreams, dreams.
Make your own aggregator and go for it... :)
Only the clearing of position differences between liquidity providers, be prepared to sort it out yourself.
Theoretically it is possible. Even automatically. Try to sketch a scheme of such a robot, it may not be so "prohibitively complicated".
But for testing the matting this scheme is good (0.01 lot, which is available at GKFX).
This is what needs to be explained in the picture.
I will not be able to use the TS for real.
ZS: it is in fact a test of ECN, but you emphasize the fact that you can raise the same percentage in real time.
This is what needs to be explained in the picture.
I agree that the context was ambiguous.
I agree that the context was ambiguous. I shouldn't have written it that way.
I have not even mentioned it in any way. ZS: It's basically a test of ECN, but you're making the point that you can raise the same percentage in real time too.
Not only did I not make such an emphasis, I didn't even mention it.
I said (about the possibility of high percentages) in the context of hrenfx's accusations of falsification of his PAMMs. So there were quite different algorithms working there.
It would be cool if the platform had not just one glass, but from each supplier. The UST would be the UST. Transparent. And often the bid would be higher than the ask. Buy from one, sell to another immediately. And in general.
Dreams, dreams.
There is such a terminal on the market, developments for several years. The price of the issue is high, because you have to open accounts, including on LMAX exchange.
+++++
The whole topic showed the poverty of thought of the public here, it all boils down to stupid discussion of manipulation and statistical arbitrage, shallow.
Not a single interesting research topic in which one would want to take up the discussion.
Not a single interesting research topic that I would like to take up for discussion.
(How about raising a topic on how to do forensics properly yourself? )
I agree that the context was ambiguous. I shouldn't have written it that way.
Not only did I not make such an emphasis, I didn't even mention it.
I was talking (about the possibility of high interest) in the context of hrenfx's accusations of falsifying his PAMMs. So there were very different algorithms working there.
I'm not sure what other algorithms worked on the "pammy" dick fics.