Anti-martingale - page 7
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
A few times before I've opened a similar theme https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/6919 And not everybody reacted adequately to it, but still there were more discussions and considerations and less snobbism in the categorical statements of market "gurus", who know everything and have the only correct opinion... :) By the way, the system testing reports for almost 11 years with Martin and anti-martin were published there (otherwise, some "gurus" who want to teach and instruct the "gray masses", systems with Martin do not live more than a year...). There's also a history of trades in the reports, if you want to take a look.
Gentlemen, tell me the song "Chili" with a list of addicts as the name in English, please!
Why addicts? http://en.lyrsense.com/chilly/we_are_the_pop_kings_in_town it doesn't say anything about addicts. In general, the word "junkie" is no more meaningful than "sinner" or "heretic", it is mainly used to pasteurize vegetables watching zombie TV.
An addict or an alcoholic, for example, might be called a socially deranged person, especially from immoderate use of substances, but calling someone an addict like Kennedy or Elvis does not really cut it. Such "junkies" are great drug propaganda)))
Pace: nice song)))
Speaking of "junkies", I recently watched the film "The Insiders" and it turns out that Volstreet traders do it, on a par with pop celebrities.
I've opened a similar theme before https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/6919. Not everyone reacted adequately to this theme then, but there were more discussions and arguments and less snobbery in the categorical statements of market "gurus" who know everything and have the only correct opinion... :) By the way, the system testing reports for almost 11 years with Martin and anti-martin were published there (otherwise, some "gurus" who want to teach and instruct the "gray masses" have systems with Martin not live more than a year...). There's also a history of trades in the reports, if you want to take a look.
You can do a lot of things in the tester on history, but the practical application is on real money.
Do you personally use martin in trading, what are your successes?
You can draw a lot on history in the tester, but the practical application is on real money.
Do you personally use martin in trading, what is your success rate?
You haven't read my topic carefully - for many years I've been sticking to the imposed view of martin, that it's almost an absolute evil in trading. And only recently have I decided to develop my own opinion on the subject. The fastest way to get the answers is the tester. Because I haven't performed any optimization (read: adaptation to the history) and trading in the tester was performed with a fixed lot, I personally have reasons to believe the obtained results. For the future I can say that perhaps I will use in real trading and martin and anti-martin with the caveat that in pure form without them, the trading system will make much more than 50% of correct entries.
Immediately a word of advice, adapt not kolno correct entries in the strategy, and minimize the sequence of losing orders, at me at least 3 of 4 transactions unprofitable, if only there were no 6 losing trades in a row and 2 profitable, the average deposit easily withstands 3-4 doubling the lot, but 6-7 is 6=>64, and 7=>128, I just have a deal will not open after 5-6 and then the doubling, at 1 leverage:1000, at 1:100, in cent account I have a balance of 10 $ = 1000 units, 1:100, and I have 0.1 lot margin of 100 units, so I will go only 3 doublings, and it still depends on how much I lose on these losing trades
I am very good with martin, but so far not a single strategy with a combination of losing trades less than 6 and that's in a year of history, and there, on the whole history, anything can happen, because it's a fit.
Martin can be used... The only thing you need to do is:
1. find a system where trades are not random.
For example, we programmed a system in which SL=TP per trade are equal and fixed. Have tested on the history, we had 1000 transactions (the more the better), of them 50% of profitable and 50% of unprofitable, with TP = SL profit in the end zero and seems to be sad ... But we see (following is a simplified and idealized example), the sequence of trades is as follows ++ -- ++ -- ++ -- ++ -- ++ -- ... -- ++ (in short, you have found a pattern and your entries are not random). So, it would be a shame not to add a martin and become a trading legend =).
2. To withdraw profit from time to time;
3) And have Steel Balls! =), because with increasing lot and drawdown growth it is morally and psychologically hard to look at all this. You feel an urge to help the robot, to pull a stop loss closer or to close a position at all;
If you manage to get profit using Anti-Martin/Martin, why not use it?
P,S, By the way, on roulette martin not rota =).
P.S. By the way, martin doesn't work on roulette =).
lazarev-d-m:
Well, if you bet on the numbers, then yes, and if the black and white, then it works, as a kid I remember it all, but the interest is only from getting money, not from the game
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On red and black too, if you come into a casino with $100 and want to make another $100 using a martin, your odds are below 50%.
In short, no matter how you play roulette, your odds are always lower due to the size of your winnings.
The numbers on the roulette wheel are 37 of them: 18 black, 18 red, and a zero.
If you bet on a colour of $100, then in case you win, in theory, you should be paid $100*19/18=105.56, but in reality, you only get paid 100.
The same situation when you bet on a number. Should win 100 * 36/1 = 3600, but in reality you will be paid only 3500.
In cards, maybe martin can work. A lot depends on the man there. I know someone who has a good memory and remembers all the cards that came out, who took what, how many are left in the deck. It turns out that he has a better chance initially than the other players.
In cards, martin may work. A lot depends on the person. I have an acquaintance who has a good memory and remembers all the cards that came out, who took what, how many are left in the deck. It turns out that he has a better chance than the other players.
In this case the dude can manage without martin)))).
Watching on TV, there is a scientist who likes to play a card game, but they won't let him in because he once cleaned out a casino just by calculating the probability of this or that card, he can go in, but they won't let him play)))