Voluntary certification of programmers in the Work service - page 4
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
)))) why don't we also test customers at the entrance to a computer shop for hardware knowledge?
The issue is not the quality of the terms of reference, but that a large part (not excluded that most) of the programmers who provide services to this site are not professionals and should not be able to provide services on an equal basis with the rest.
Funny but I see the negative reaction of man in this thread which I as much as 3 times complained about customers ) Including winning arbitration.
On the issue of discussing the job with the customer - it is your job dear colleagues, a humanitarian is not capable of drawing up TOR due to personal qualities. (I am not talking about cases where the customer does not understand what he wants in general).
Rosh, I want to hear your opinion on this proposal (certification), have you thought about it, what have you come to?
We can do things differently. Team up with Dima Integer as initiators. Create a site like mql5certification.
Formulate the rules. You can add the existence of works in the codebase and rating on this forum to filter out the clones, and whatever else you like.
The result is a list of programmers on the mql5certification site.
And on this forum in the profile link to certification
The costs are symbolic, so are the fees. True, for the fees we will have to check the candidates.
And we will be accused of all mortal sins from those who have not passed
We can do things differently. Team up with Dima Integer as initiators. Create a site like mql5certification.
Formulate the rules. You can add the existence of works in the codebase and rating on this forum to filter out the clones, and whatever else you like.
The result is a list of programmers on the mql5certification site.
And on this forum in the profile link to certification
The costs are symbolic, so are the fees. True, for the fees we will have to check the candidates.
We may be accused of all mortal sins from those who have not passed
1. Warranty and maintenance. Does the programmer provide a warranty. As if protecting the client.
2. Insurance for the work. On the client's account. Protecting the programmer.
At least if thought through, it can help in the same arbitration situations.
The proposal is certainly good and I thought about it, but here, as well as in arbitration, we need a third independent party with only one goal - to develop the service. MetaQuest is the only candidate.
Roch, I would like to hear your opinion about this proposal (attestation), have you thought about it, what have you come up with?
We can do things differently. Team up with Dima Integer as initiators. Create a site like mql5certification
)))) why don't we also test customers at the entrance to a computer shop for hardware knowledge?
Maybe then to introduce for programmers such items as
1. Warranty and maintenance. Does the programmer provides a warranty. As if to protect the client.
2. Insurance of the work. On the client's account. Protecting the programmer.
At least, if you think about it, it may help in the same arbitration situations.
Until there are adequate terms of reference on the part of the customer (either independently developed or with the help of specialists), the mess will continue.
Certification of programmers of course can improve the case (if of course it will be carried out not by intermediaries, but by and large either will not help or it will not be passed by more than 10 people.