Voluntary certification of programmers in the Work service - page 5

New comment
 
Interesting:

Until there are adequate TORs

Yes, we should also write an introductory article on lokas to increase adequacy, and a link too.
 
Interesting:

As long as there are no adequate terms of reference from the customer (either independently developed or with the help of specialists), the mess will continue.

Certification of programmers certainly can improve the case (if it is performed by language developers, not intermediaries), but by and large either will not help or it will pass no more than 10 people.

The choice for the programmer is either to refuse the task or to help form the ToR.

10 people or 100 - it absolutely does not matter. We need a systematic approach and a definite policy of the company in this matter.

 
Integer:
That won't do, we are the persons concerned.

So what? No one doubts your integrity. That's why you can team up with two or three others and not care about squabbles. There will always be squabbles.

I do not know what Rashid will say, but I don't think they need it. We need to develop the service. At this stage of development they need a shaft. Any restrictions are unlikely to work.

Also, if you do it, avoid any internal ratings and anything that may quarrel with you internally. And the presence of papers in a codebase or article I would make item number 1.

Let them write. Let them check the metaquotes.

 
abolk:
You will be in danger of being disrespected. Banned permanently.
I heard you, stop offtopic, sluggish attempts to discredit the topicpaster won't give you the opportunity to gloss over the topic.
 
Oh, what about compulsory certification for marketeers?
 
TheXpert:
Oh, what about mandatory certification of marketplace sellers?
The seller is the resource. The programmer is the manufacturer and it is assessed by the resource.
 
TheXpert:
Oh, what about the mandatory certification of marketplace vendors?

Product passed testing - all OK, didn't pass - didn't make it to the showcase.

Why else would there be something?

 
Mischek:
The seller is the resource. The programmer is the manufacturer and is assessed by the resource.
The seller is the vendor. The resource is more of an intermediary. The quality of the programming is one of the features of the evaluation. If the evaluation is carried out, the code may not be checked.
 
TheXpert:
Oh, what about the mandatory certification of market vendors?

What is the seller's certification for?

There is a demo of the product, there are testimonials - why a vendor certificate?

 
abolk: And what would this certificate be an indication of?
That the product is not built by hand, has potentially fewer bugs, and that the author is a real professional, not a waffler.
123456789101112...17
New comment
Reason: