Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 3229

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I wonder if Kaggle would have done well.....
Finances, of course, could be an incentive....
If it's not enough, then what do you look for on MO when you feed in many years?
Well, I forecast every bar. Some people even predict 1 trade a day if some conditions are met, like you. It's different for everyone.
Theoretical question.
Condition.
As a result, there is a certain history, which definitely has a regularity. This history can be of any required length.
Question.
If we are discussing MO, we need to separate the flies from the cutlets:
1. there is a classification model that predicts the next step(s) with some error
2. there is an Expert Advisor that uses the model according to item 1 and trades on the account with some profit/loss.
I am able to create classification models according to point 1 that give less than 20% error. This classification error is about the same on the following four files:
1. a training file obtained by randomly sampling from the original file
2. a testing file obtained as an addition to a random sample of the training file
3. a validation file obtained as an addition to a random sample of the training and testing file
4. An additional regular file with the usual sequence of prices.
Here on the site, I've laid out many times the theoretical justifications for the stability of this result.
And on quotes, on prices, it is theoretically impossible to create an Expert Advisor that trades profitably, because financial series are NOT stationary, i.e. any history does not matter, with or without your tricks. The initial price series CANNOT be used to build a profitable system. And not only price series (quotes), but also any varieties of mashes.
We are planning to launch another championship aimed at promoting neural networks:
The idea is good.
However, onnx is for model conversion, but how to generate a date for it? Or will there be ready-made predictors in the MQL5 template?
100% of MO traders said YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEssss!!!!
99.9% of MO traders said - oh shit ((( what the hell is onnx ))
Will there be any requirements for the complexity of models? Or are the models allowed to be so simple that it is possible to participate even with a "MACD" model?
is to find a solution so that we can .
IO tools have not yet been able to do this on the fly.
And it won't.
I've been watching the results in this thread.
Every strategy is a pips.
I wonder how a programme with a 1 year deal will behave?
Will there be any requirements for the complexity of the models? Or are the models allowed to be so simple that it is possible to participate even with a "MACD" model?
Scalpers will be prohibited by the rules.
The goal is clearly stated - to stimulate the development of ML models for trading, and not to give an opportunity to make money in the old way, to fill up trivial scalpers under the guise of models, etc.
Scalpers will be banned by rule.
Kitchen.
Kitchen.
MetaQuotes-Demo.
We have been running championships since 2006 and we know very well that any championship under ideal conditions (e.g. demo server) degenerates into a useless venture when scalpers are allowed. Other reasonable strategies are immediately at the bottom.
That's why we have always removed scalpers in order to let participants compete in more or less calm conditions.
The goal is not to give another scalper easy money. The goal is to stimulate more active development of serious machine learning models and their application in MQL5.
I recommend to look at the world not from the point of view of yourself and your personal optimisation strategies. I pointed out the function of championship optimisation right away.
History of Automated Trading Champions hips.