Maxim Dmitrievsky: In a sequence, each subsequent element must be related to the previous ones, such as words in a sentence. Otherwise it's just unstructured garbage, what to look for
That's if you know the unit to look for!!! And you know ?????
In real data you know nothing !!! no sequence size, no range, no proper clusters...
Maybe you need to get some sleep ? ))
You have a generalization task, and you randomly throw in numbers. At least put them in the same positions on each line. Sleep is a sacred thing, that's what I do.
Maxim Dmitrievsky: You have a generalization problem, and you randomly throw in numbers. Put them at least on the same positions in each line
I did that absolutely deliberately...
The market is not stationary and when you create a dataset by sliding window, roughly speaking all the chips will never hit their row, think about it, it's obvious
And the generalization algorithm will just look for them in the same position where it saw them on the tray...
I only left the correct sequence... It's the only objective
That's why the RNN is better, due to its memory it just slightly compensates for this floating of chips by positions in strings
The market is not stationary and when you create a dataset by sliding window, roughly speaking all the chips will never hit your line, think about it, it's obvious
And the generalization algorithm will just look for them in the same position where it saw them on the tray...
I only left the correct sequence... It's the only objective
Right, but if there is some regularity in the sequence, then the grid will highlight the context. And if there is randomness like you have, it won't. 4 values out of 200 doesn't add any regularity, it's part of the noise in my opinion. Well, put it in the rnn, check it, you have it in R. I'm asleep already, from my phone
Maxim Dmitrievsky: True, but if there is some regularity in the sequence, then the grid will highlight the context. And if there is randomness like in your case, it won't. 4 values out of 200 doesn't add any regularity, it's part of the noise in my opinion. Well put it in the rnn, check it, you have it in R. I'm asleep already, from my phone
In a sequence, each subsequent element must be related to the previous ones, such as words in a sentence. Otherwise it's just unstructured garbage, what to look for
Fuck, you don't know what I mean... ((
You have no idea what I'm talking about... ((
binary search, then share
calculate how many combinations it takes to search all sequences of size 10 with a range of values between 1 and 5k
))))))) try
a sequence of size 10 with a range of values from 1 to 20
That's184756 combinations.
and here's 5k !!!!!!!
Well, calculate how many combinations it takes to search all sequences of size 10 with a range of values inside from 1 to 5k
))))))) try it
In the loop you find a one, in the rest of the array you look for a two... ah, one pass through the array
MlLLaLLaLLaLLaLLaLLaLLaLLaLLaLLaLLaLLaL .....
That's if you know to look for the one!!! And you know ?????
In real data you know nothing !!! no sequence size, no range, no proper clusters...
Maybe you need to get some sleep ? ))
MLEARLY.....
That's if you know the unit to look for!!! And you know ?????
In real data you know nothing !!! no sequence size, no range, no proper clusters...
Maybe you need to get some sleep ? ))
You have a generalization problem, and you randomly throw in numbers. Put them at least on the same positions in each line
I did that absolutely deliberately...
The market is not stationary and when you create a dataset by sliding window, roughly speaking all the chips will never hit their row, think about it, it's obvious
And the generalization algorithm will just look for them in the same position where it saw them on the tray...
I only left the correct sequence... It's the only objective
That's why the RNN is better, due to its memory it just slightly compensates for this floating of chips by positions in strings
I did it absolutely consciously...
The market is not stationary and when you create a dataset by sliding window, roughly speaking all the chips will never hit your line, think about it, it's obvious
And the generalization algorithm will just look for them in the same position where it saw them on the tray...
I only left the correct sequence... It's the only objective
True, but if there is some regularity in the sequence, then the grid will highlight the context. And if there is randomness like in your case, it won't. 4 values out of 200 doesn't add any regularity, it's part of the noise in my opinion. Well put it in the rnn, check it, you have it in R. I'm asleep already, from my phone
Okay, sleepy,
I'm drunk on coffee, I can't sleep.)