Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 1629
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
SA?
It's all there about converting rows. So that's basic, what are you suffering from?
SA == StackOwerflow
There's nothing in there about fractality in the context of learning AMO.
It's horribly simple but it should work, it doesn't matter which rows you put there, just minutes/weeks, all together, it will find both patterns and the main thing is that it will give me adequate answer...
SA == StackOwerflow
There's nothing about fractality in the context of learning AMO
I invented a transformation, it's horribly simple but it should work, it doesn't matter what rows you put into it, minutes / weeks, all together, it will find both patterns and most importantly give an adequate response
don't worry about fractality, it's just a fiction.
No, I didn't mangle anything thereForget about fractality, it's a fiction.
It's a fiction to look up the dimensionality by khurst, but scaling the data to one template for AMO is correct and necessary otherwise you just won't find repetitions in the data, and therefore no statistics, probability...
It's a fiction to look up the dimensionality by khirst, but scaling the data to one template for AMO is correct and necessary, otherwise you just won't find any repetitions in the data, and therefore no statistics, probability...
I scaled it, it's bullshit ) and by khirst bullshit, of course, and by entropy
I scaled it.
how?
how?
affine preconversions.
mikha! are you going to answer my question on the last page or not? did i get your article right?
affine transformations.
let me guess, and you did all this in a sliding window, fixed size of course ? )
let me guess, and you did all this in a sliding window, fixed size of course ? )
the bigger the window, the better the correlation
and for different TFs did. It's all bullshit.in the expanding one, like the bigger the window and the higher the correlation the better
Hmm, and the predictions on the training data, as well as on the recognition test data, did you also expand/decrease ? or there was a fixed mark