Discussion of article "Combination scalping: analyzing trades from the past to increase the performance of future trades" - page 2

 
As part of the research of this "Combination Scalping Method", Agreed Forex Levels were found. This is briefly written at the end of the this article. Since then, I have devoted all my time to exploring these levels. And the preliminary results are impressive! Even simple trading algorithms work effectively, and there are many options for trading strategies. Research for the years ahead!

GBPUSD, H1

Agreed Forex Levels on Chart


Each level (horizontal line) is 225 pips.
Each dot is a 225 pips movement.

Examples of other trading weeks and Agreed Forex Levels:

GBPUSD, 01-05 February 2021

Total pips per week = 11025 pips


GBPUSD, 01-04 June 2021

Total pips per week = 7650 pips  


GBPUSD, 17-21 May 2021

Total pips per week = 8325 pips


GBPUSD, 22-26 February 2021

Total pips per week = 21825 pips.   2182 points per week!


Who is looking for the treasure? Here it is! You just need to take it.

 
Consistent Forex Levels were discovered as part of the research for this "Combinational Scalping Method". It is briefly written about it at the end of the article. Since then, I have devoted all my time to researching these levels. And the preliminary results are impressive! Even simple trading algorithms work effectively, and there are many variants of trading strategies. Research for years to come!


GBPUSD, H1

Agreed Forex Levels on Chart


Each level (horizontal line) is 225 pips
Each point is a 225 pip move.

Examples of other trading weeks and Forex Agreed Levels:

GBPUSD, 01-05 February 2021

Total pips for the week = 11025 pips


GBPUSD, 01-04 June 2021

Total pips for the week = 7650 pips


GBPUSD, 17-21 May 2021

Total number of pips for the week = 8325 pips


GBPUSD, 22-26 February 2021

Total number of pips for the week = 21825 pips. 2182 pips for the week!


Who's looking for riches? Here it is! All you have to do is take

 
Why look at what bars were before the plus trades. If you have found, as you say, that with a take of 7p and holding time of 7 minutes most trades give a plus? That's what you need, why further tricks?
All right, then run all the trades by the size of the 3 previous candles and their colour. In absolute values, of course, there will be many variants, the smaller the size of the take, as deals with a smaller take will be more. That is, we will have a very small number of trades for each such variant, and we know what the law of large numbers is. Sooner or later it will be 50/50, that is, if you continue to trade on the combinations found, then gradually they will be plus combinations will give out minuses and vice versa.
 
ゆうじ 保坂:
That's a difficult explanation! In the meantime, I would like to start investing again after receiving a refund of my MT4 balance, so please refund my principal! Please refund my principal!

 
 
This article makes me think of dynamic stop loss and take profit, which could be used in optimization to tell you at which profit and stop loss level providing you the best profit margin.
 
I'm sorry, but these studies are complete nonsense. wishful thinking. it's called falsification of results.
you can just as easily take any price and from it find a price that will be repeated more often than others in History.
but only you enter the real with this strategy, as all illusions dissipate.
 

The article is excellent. The work has been done extensively, but still if it is scalping (intraday trading) then in my opinion the analysis should be by trading sessions taking into account their overlapping. It is connected with different volatility of markets.

As for "Bonus". Cool, but very complicated. I will be glad if your variant attracts attention. This pattern was identified by me a few years ago. A group of turkeys with different approach to defining a trading range (not to be confused with price range) was written. There was also a whole blog article dedicated to it. But....... The interest is minimal. More precisely there is none.

Good luck with your research.

first option

second option

 
Hi! The idea is beautiful. Is there an implementation in the form of a simple EA? I would like to test it, at least on demo.
 
Positive thinking, But the statistical method is wrong, the absolute value should not be used at bar.  Using absolute value statistics, the sample size in a single case must be very small.  The statistics don't tell anything.  It can be improved according to the idea.