Outline of MetaTrader Market (Infographics) - page 2

New comment
 
artmedia70:

A loose translation of what he said as it happened:

"I bought the indicator. The indicator signals are almost identical to the crossing of two MAs. In flat market the result of trading with this indicator is bad. On the trend market it is good. It seems to me that it is impossible to make money with it.

Two days later, the developer asks me to delete my review, as it is negative and badly affects his sales. I didn't answer him anything, but now I understand why there were no negative reviews for his product - the programmer simply returns money for his product to those who left negative reviews, on the condition that the review will be removed."

What's ambiguous about it?

It's a competitor's trickery, I don't earn so much money to return something to someone).

And ambiguous - an example from life. A person bought it, wrote a review - "it didn't work for a week, the Expert Advisor works only in the tester ... etc." I wrote to him and asked him about it, it turned out that the button-autotrade should have been pressed. The buyer changed his review, so it is ambiguous.

 
Mechanic:

I don't make so much money that I have to return anything to anyone).

And ambiguous - an example from life. A person bought, wrote a review - "did not work for a week, the Expert Advisor works only in the tester ... etc." I wrote to him and asked him about it, it turned out that the button-autotrade should have been pressed. The buyer changed his feedback, so it's ambiguous.

Well, it's an indicator, it doesn't depend on the button. It signals as a crossing of two MAs. What prevents you from writing in the product description that it works normally only in the trend market?

The buyer wrote about it so that others would be aware of it and would not lose money on it in flat markets. What's wrong with it?

And then the most interesting thing starts....

 
artmedia70:

Well, it's an indicator. It signals as a crossing of two MAs. What prevents you from writing in the product description that it works only in the trend market?

The buyer wrote about it so that others would be aware of it and would not lose money on it in flat markets. What's wrong with it?

And then the most interesting thing starts....

Let's not discuss my products, please, the question was not raised about that
 
Mechanic:
Let's not discuss my products, please, the question was not about that
The question was about kickbacks. It's a little more sensitive, isn't it?
 
artmedia70:
The question was raised about kickbacks. It's more sensitive, no?
No,)
 
Mechanic:
No,)

We demand satisfaction!!!

Kickbacks for "hushing up the subject", and hushing up .... :)))))))

 
And in general it would be cool if each product from the market had its own thread on the forum, the tape in the discussions is not very convenient, especially from the phone
 

Here's what's important for Marketplace -- so here's what's important:

-- Prohibit deleting/correcting any feedback left for any reason. Better to allow the Seller to write a response to a negative review. But deleting reviews or revoking reviews by the Buyer -- should be banned.

-- Mandatory demonstration of the work -- in the form of a Signal -- of each Expert Advisor sold. And, most importantly, if these Signals are leaked, they should be available as an Archive. Links to demo signals should be on the product page.

Negative feedback + demonstration of real work of the Expert Advisor (even on a demo account) is the key to the most objective presentation of information about the Product.

After all, the result of buying an Expert Advisor is probably a lost deposit. Therefore, the information should be complete and the seller should be responsible.

 
abolk:

Here's what's important for Marketplace -- so here's what's important:

-- Prohibit deleting/correcting any feedback left for any reason. Better to allow the Seller to write a response to a negative review. But deleting reviews or revoking reviews by the Buyer -- should be banned.

-- Mandatory demonstration of the work -- in the form of a Signal -- of each Expert Advisor sold. And, most importantly, if these Signals are leaked, they should be available as an Archive. Links to demo signals should be on the product page.

Negative feedback + demonstration of real work of the Expert Advisor (even on a demo account) is the key to the most objective presentation of information about the Product.

After all, the result of buying an Expert Advisor is probably a lost deposit. Therefore, the information should be complete and the seller should be responsible.

I have even created a separate thread about monitoring real accounts, so I'm in favour of it!
 
abolk:

Here's what's important for Marketplace -- so here's what's important:

-- Prohibit deleting/correcting any feedback left for any reason. Better to allow the Seller to write a response to a negative review. But deleting reviews or revoking reviews by the Buyer -- should be banned.

-- Mandatory demonstration of the work -- in the form of a Signal -- of each Expert Advisor sold. And, most importantly, if these Signals are leaked, they should be available as an Archive. Links to demo signals should be on the product page.

Negative feedback + demonstration of real work of the Expert Advisor (even on a demo account) is the key to the most objective presentation of information about the Product.

After all, the result of buying an Expert Advisor is probably a lost deposit. Therefore, the information should be complete and the seller should be responsible.

At least six months to show the work of the Expert Advisor on the account. During this time the Market will outlive its time. And if the Expert Advisor does not trade? And if it is an indicator? And if it is a tool for manual trading, and if ... if ... if ...
1234
New comment