Outline of MetaTrader Market (Infographics) - page 4
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Am I right to understand that more (significantly) programs are sold for MT4? Since sales for the four became possible not so long ago, and the statistics are from 2012, and the sales volume is approximately equal.
And where did you see the comparison of MT4 and MT5?
Charts show the percentage ratio for each terminal separately.
But under MT4, supposedly, much more is sold - simply because there are many more potential buyers.
Where did you see a comparison of MT4 and MT5?
The graphs show the percentage for each terminal separately.
But under MT4, supposedly, much more is sold - simply because there are more potential buyers.
Yes, I didn't look at it carefully. Then it would be fair to show in figures how many programmes for 4 and 5 are sold.
...
This is wrong. Neither buyers nor sellers should be allowed to moderate their posts. If there is a discussion of the product with the moderator in the product's private area, then that's where such issues should be solved. Of course this is an unnecessary burden on the moderators, but ... why do we need them then...That's exactly right - the main thing in any marketplace (as an example, you can look at Allibaba and eBay) is buyer satisfaction and incentive for the seller. If the refund satisfies the buyer, and the possibility of changing the evaluation stimulates the seller to do it - then that's what it is.
Another thing is that you can keep the history of such changes in evaluations, which will ensure the possibility of objective evaluation by new buyers. But it is not a fact that this will not reduce the seller's incentive to refund.
Judging by the dates of comments, the topic is not relevant at all, as well as the transition to MT5...alas....
The very purchase of a product is a cat in a bag...take Ebay as an example.
We are moving in the wrong direction...and statistics should be taken from the number of users who use MT4, there are millions of them,
and then it turns out that there are practically no real movements on the market...
Everything is known in comparison.
The very purchase of a product is a cat in a bag...take Ebay as an example.
A different way and can not be, the seller himself does not know whether his robot will bring a profit tomorrow or not, yes, it is simply impossible to know, unless of course he is not selling a monkey, then he certainly knows how it ends :). Many newbies are guided by beautiful monitoring and a bunch of stars and rush to buy such robots.naturally, after one or two drained deposits they have confidence in the market, and actually to the platform itself begins to aspire to zero, and the seller at this time already launches another temporary-beautiful monitoring on virtually the same robot, only slightly modified and with a different name and in a month he already has a bunch of stars from the allegedly real-raised on the robot grateful customers, in general carousel :). It is necessary on all labels of robots, which use in one form or another martingale or increasing risks in trading, to put warning signs of increased risk.(imho) It is one thing not to earn, and quite another thing to lose everything. People who lost everything will not want to return to the market and try something else.
The statistics are good. Only the promotion of products is in trouble. There is no advertising rotator and it is not planned, as far as I understand. You can only search if you already know what you are looking for. Very often a person needs specific features, and the name is unimportant and unknown to him. But if, say, this person comes here to the forum and writes that he needs this and that, he can be sent (in a good sense, and sometimes in a bad sense) only to the codebase or to work. But it is forbidden to give a link to an already finished product that meets the requirements. It's not clear how it differs from work - there is exactly the same commercial background and one of the developers will earn money on the order by giving a commission to MK. So how is a commission on a product in the Marketplace worse than a commission on a job?
I agree
It is time to update the statistics.
This kind of market insight will attract new sellers and buyers.
As a retired journalist, I can publicise the new statistics if they are released now.
I'm curious how the market changed over the years.