Discussion of article "Exploring Seasonal Patterns of Financial Time Series with Boxplot" - page 16
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The bot from the article is optimised as it is (not modified), it works on OOS, nothing new....
It doesn't work a damn thing in the article.
Well, let them reproduce it, but the parameters set are useless, it will take a long time to optimise it.
Three minutes - long?
The article doesn't work for shit.
Three minutes is long?
Everything in the article works as intended. What kind of a stump of a reader would have to be not to optimise it?
Let's see what 3 minutes on a laptop not accustomed to stupid optimisation.
So far it's showing 700 hours of bruteforcing.Would never have found it without research, if only because they 'd still be trying to sell it
What's the colour of a child's surprise? It's a stupid time-filtering machine.
so far shows 700 hours of bruteforcing.
Valenok?
Forum on trading, automated trading systems and testing trading strategies
Discussion of the article "Investigation of seasonal characteristics of financial time series using Boxplot charts"
fxsaber, 2019.12.08 23:34 ; Connect to MetaQuotes-Demo.
; Этот текст скопировать в буфер обмена и сделать CTRL+V во вкладке Настроки Тестера.What is that colour of childish surprise? It's a stupid time filter.
In short, Saber has either gone crazy from optimisations and confusing the original code with unnecessary scribbles, or what.....
I'm not paying for 700 hours
A felt boot?
That's the one I copied. I get it, it's all bullshit.
In short, Saber has either gone crazy from optimisations and confusing the original code with unnecessary scribbles, or what...
By the way, very important scribbles.
I'm not going to spend 700 hours
If you had done it according to the instructions, it would have been three minutes. It's okay, others will reproduce it. It's very simple.
Very important doodles, by the way.
If you'd done it by the book, it would have taken three minutes. It's okay, others will reproduce it. It's very simple.
If you did CTRL+V, you would have seen GA.
If you did CTRL+V, you would have seen GA.
I did, and I didn't see GA.
What else didn't I see?