I would love to see the lwma based one indeed.
It displays nothing.
I'm using build 2190.
My experts tab says
Line 69 :
val[i]=(dev!=0) ?(_price-avg)/(0.015*dev) : 0;
If you have changed that line, undo the change.
If you didn't and it still does the same report it to metaquotes (since your terminal obviously does not recognize the "dev!=0" part then)
Nothing to be changed in the code
Line 69 :
If you have changed that line, undo the change.
If you didn't and it still does the same report it to metaquotes (since your terminal obviously does not recognize the "dev!=0" part then)
Nothing to be changed in the code
I haven't changed the code.
By the way, I tested the following indicators and only the jma one displayed itself.
https://www.mql5.com/en/code/20925
https://www.mql5.com/en/code/22482
https://www.mql5.com/en/code/21253
I haven't changed the code.
By the way, I tested the following indicators and only the jma one displayed itself.
https://www.mql5.com/en/code/20925
https://www.mql5.com/en/code/22482
https://www.mql5.com/en/code/21253
Please read my post again : zero checking code is done. On my terminal they are working correctly (as you can see from my previous posts). Nothing to be changed in the code. All the best
Please read my post again : zero checking code is done. On my terminal they are working correctly (as you can see from my previous posts). Nothing to be changed in the code. All the best
I haven't said "Hey, this is a problem. please fix it" I just reported an issue. All the best

- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
You agree to website policy and terms of use
CCI - EMA based:
CCI (Commodity Channel Index) is normally calculated using Simple Moving Average and mean deviation based on that same Simple Moving Average.
This version of CCI is changing that. Instead of using Simple Moving Average it uses EMA (Exponential Moving Average), and instead of using mean deviation it uses EMA deviation (originally published here EMA Deviation). That gives us a sort of a completely new CCI and the difference, when compared to original Donald Lambert calculation is significant in a lot of cases.
Author: Mladen Rakic