2 QQE combined and anchored - Need help - page 4
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I do not know if I shared the indicator is correct.
Sell signal in the original version of joe..
With the new indicator its far from it..
Take a look at the picture
I do not know if I shared the indicator is correct.
Sell signal in the original version of joe..
With the new indicator its far from it..
Take a look at the picture
It is normal hellkas
The non anchored version, moves a little and is by fact more effective, but we can't entirely rely on it
But i can tell you i take the up on gy for 250 pips
It is normal hellkas
The non anchored version, moves a little and is by fact more effective, but we can't entirely rely on it
Sometimes I prefer your indicator.. Its more profitable.. But could be more risky too..
But i can tell you i take the up on gy for 250 pips
QQE_x2trail_sf.mq4 (2.3 KB) works with QQE.mq4 (3.1 KB) posted by Joe in first post (here just in case, to be in one place)
difference only : QQE - SF inputs; QQEA- SF & rsi period extern inputs
Originally Posted by Big Joe
It is normal hellkas
The non anchored version, moves a little and is by fact more effective, but we can't entirely rely on it
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Joe
since it based on rsi which oscillates 0-100; you can set same max min in both ind. properties - should be good
QQEA_x2trail.mq4 (2.4 KB) ind. works only with
QQEA.mq4 (3.2 KB)
make sure ind. installed properly, name is correct
inputs:
SF1 = 5;
SF2 = 7;
RSI_Period1 = 14;
RSI_Period2 = 24;
Double QQE ?....
Place a MACD 5,14,1 on any pair (cross with the center line) and go over one week data (5min) and see on witch pair the double QQE (anchored) out-performs the simple MACD ?....none
Come on guys, you are members who have been looking for ages to your screen and to indicators and to setups. Can't understand this. And especially not the interest for the non-anchored setup. At some points you can move your chart with only one bar and you have a compleet different setup.
It is like trying to look to 2 objects in a far distance with one eye covered and trying to say witch object is closer then the other.
QQEA_2xtraiL4H.mq4 (4.0 KB) pulls same trailor QQEA.mq4 (3.2 KB
with 4c bar - would make it easier to see and compare perfrmance
Place a MACD 5,14,1 on any pair (cross with the center line) and go over one week data (5min) and see on witch pair the double QQE (anchored) out-performs the simple MACD ?....none
Come on guys, you are members who have been looking for ages to your screen and to indicators and to setups. Can't understand this. And especially not the interest for the non-anchored setup. At some points you can move your chart with only one bar and you have a compleet different setup.
It is like trying to look to 2 objects in a far distance with one eye covered and trying to say witch object is closer then the other.ok, let's see. ferst pair: where macd outperforms qqe? ... Igor, are you sure you meant macd?
Nice
Nice.. I like it! Thanks you FXBS
QQEA_2xtraiL4H.mq4 (4.0 KB) pulls same trailor QQEA.mq4 (3.2 KB with 4c bar - would make it easier to see and compare perfrmance