High Potential Hedging EA, EURUSD vs USDCHF - page 4
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
its martingales.... 0.1 using nanolot account... 6 lot equal to 0.6 by the way
Right, I looked too quickly. OK for "0.6" but it's still a ratio of 60 times. That being said, here's my statement - negative closed trades balance, but overall equity is up, though the trades didn't yet close out (dunno why). This is a mini, not a micro BTW.
Settings:
TakeProfit=100
Lots=0.1
InitialStop=0
TrailingStop=20
MaxTrades=10
Pips=10
SecureProfit=0
AccountProtection=0
OrderstoProtect=3
mm=0
risk=1
AccountisNormal=0
I think these were default. All in all, +15% which is pretty good
. What are the best settings?
Right, I looked too quickly. OK for "0.6" but it's still a ratio of 60 times. That being said, here's my statement - negative closed trades balance, but overall equity is up, though the trades didn't yet close out (dunno why). This is a mini, not a micro BTW.
Settings:
TakeProfit=100
Lots=0.1
InitialStop=0
TrailingStop=20
MaxTrades=10
Pips=10
SecureProfit=0
AccountProtection=0
OrderstoProtect=3
mm=0
risk=1
AccountisNormal=0
I think these were default. All in all, +15% which is pretty goodif you read my first post in this thread. I let you guys play with your best settings... and i do not guarantee this kind of EA will be profitable in the long run...i was just curious to see how it behaves. I am using setting as below:
take profit : 15
trail : 0
initial stop : 0
max trade : 10
pip : 8
just play this setting...
Why randomly play with settings? If we know how the settings are supposed to function we can come up with settings that work.
Why randomly play with settings? If we know how the settings are supposed to function we can come up with settings that work.
The reason we're here is to optimize the settings, not posting the best setting for you. If you already have the holy grail, please post it, if not, do not post this kind of crab! You're putting everybody down with that word. Try to imagine, if everybody test with the same settings, what is the purpose of redundant data?! Please do your home work, and contribute to the forum.
Meanwhile, the new EA has to be very hard on codings, give me a little bit more time. I hope I can give you guys a good solution by then. Good trading
Regards,
David
Why randomly play with settings? If we know how the settings are supposed to function we can come up with settings that work.
you should read the whole thread 10points3 or multilotscalper...dont be spoon fed....
acccount protection = 1, it will close all trades when stopped out...it has its own calculated stop loss ( max trades x pip = auto stop loss ) if you set 0, it means you allow it running until margin call or etc...
secure profit = 5, i believe its usd5...when net profit reach more than usd5, it will close all trades..
MM = 1, will open lots by itself based on risk of margin to be used...
there you go!!!
Who's asking to be spood fed? If you're not going to post the source, no big deal, but at least explain it. Sure it may be based on 10points3 but you state you changed it to "be more aggressive". Is this more aggressive lot sizing?
And I wasn't asking for anybody else's settings, just an explanation on the internal operations of the EA. And what's the point of putting this thing out there other than to optimize it? Sure we all have to try different settings to gather data and I posted my settings, my nightly results as well as educated guesses on the internal operations. How is that not contributing?
Go figure.
backtest
Who's asking to be spood fed? If you're not going to post the source, no big deal, but at least explain it. Sure it may be based on 10points3 but you state you changed it to "be more aggressive". Is this more aggressive lot sizing?
And I wasn't asking for anybody else's settings, just an explanation on the internal operations of the EA. And what's the point of putting this thing out there other than to optimize it? Sure we all have to try different settings to gather data and I posted my settings, my nightly results as well as educated guesses on the internal operations. How is that not contributing?
Go figure.yes i agree...not it is quite useless posting an expert without source code...if the purpose is just to have people running it on their platform ..;and performing same forward test as you are doing...it s useless...
I tried to make quick backtest..;but its just backtesting 2007...
Who's asking to be spood fed? If you're not going to post the source, no big deal, but at least explain it. Sure it may be based on 10points3 but you state you changed it to "be more aggressive". Is this more aggressive lot sizing?
And I wasn't asking for anybody else's settings, just an explanation on the internal operations of the EA. And what's the point of putting this thing out there other than to optimize it? Sure we all have to try different settings to gather data and I posted my settings, my nightly results as well as educated guesses on the internal operations. How is that not contributing?
Go figure.Make your own agressive EA then
profit is usd900 now...i am happy with this week performance
The reason we're here is to optimize the settings, not posting the best setting for you. If you already have the holy grail, please post it, if not, do not post this kind of crab! You're putting everybody down with that word. Try to imagine, if everybody test with the same settings, what is the purpose of redundant data?! Please do your home work, and contribute to the forum.
Meanwhile, the new EA has to be very hard on codings, give me a little bit more time. I hope I can give you guys a good solution by then. Good trading
Regards,
Davidi think you can use your current entry signal by pipbutcher and make two different magic number...i am the one will test it first..coz i think it will work...but please extern the parameters for me.... will appreciate that..thanks