Multi Timeframe Indicators - page 489

 
zilliq:
Thanks MLaden,

In fact I call %D the second line with the Sigma Period

But sorry, I don't understand, this morning I had 2 differents numbers in Timeframe 1 and 15, and at this time it is the same numbers

I don't know what it was wrong this morning

I will ask you if it comes back

Thanks a lot one more time and have a nice evening

Zilliq

you can share it in the basement?. what is this light? STO Hull Ma ???

 
magistr913:
you can share it in the basement?. what is this light? STO Hull Ma ???

It is the indicator from this post : https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/173574/page336

 
mladen:
It is the indicator from this post : https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/173574/page336

thanks for helping

 
mladen:
The problem is that it (the source) is a decompiled source and I doubt that someone will work on such a code. That was the reason why I asked if you happen top have the original source of that indicator

Indicator is great because "nrp". Only improve.

 
popej30:
Indicator is great because "nrp". Only improve.

I would gladly help but only if it was a regular, not a decompiled code

Sorry

 

thank all of you especially Dear mladen

but I have just the red candles on my chart not the green ones

thanks

Files:
usdchfh1_1.png  52 kb
 
macd&rsi:
thank all of you especially Dear mladen

but I have just the red candles on my chart not the green ones

thanks

macd&rsi

What is the indicator that you are using?

 
mladen:
macd&rsi What is the indicator that you are using?

I should attached the indicator . pardon me , I forgot .

 
macd&rsi:
I should attached the indicator . pardon me , I forgot .

macd&rsi

You need the attached indicator too (it was posted at this post : https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/173574/page335 ) and it will work OK then (otherwise it will work as it works on your PC)

Files:
 

you can use that one. it is exactly the same as mig24.

mladen:
The problem is that it (the source) is a decompiled source and I doubt that someone will work on such a code. That was the reason why I asked if you happen top have the original source of that indicator