Indicators: SolarWinds - page 3

New comment
 

abolk:

TheXpert: And the filling of this base is entirely subjective. That is, you are fully responsible for both the quality of its filling and the quality of its content.

No, I don't. The author of the "content" is responsible for the "quality of content".

Programmer's nonsense. If we talk about "responsibility of the author of the content code", we should agree with the following:

The author of mql4 code is "responsible for the quality" of implementing some idea using mql4 tools , nothing more. The author of the mql5 code is fully responsible for the quality of the embodiment of the same idea by mql5 means.

And if some author tries to express an idea, previously embodied in the code by mql5 means, then the same author "bears full responsibility" for the embodiment of such an idea by mql5 means. So far we see only the argument that 'someone once wrote some shit, and valiant D'Artagnan translated this shit into normal Russian language'.

 

Gentlemen, don't shoot the pianist, he plays as well as he can.

And in general, let's talk concretely

Poke your nose into a specific mess in the code.

Without picking on delusions of ideas embedded in them or stolen from another language.

 
sergeev: Gentlemen, don't shoot the pianist, he plays as well as he can.

'Don't shoot the programmer, he rewrites as best he can'? - No problem, why waste ammunition?

Just let that pianist (programmer) call things by their proper names then. For example, not 'Requiem', but 'The Odessa Requiem Joke'. Not'SolarWinds', but an attempt to translate someone else's code written in another programming language. ...Like: Not 'SolarWinds', but 'SolarDreams. Based on someone else's code'.

sergeev: And in general, let's speak concretely Poke your nose into a specific lacuna in the code. Without picking on delusions of ideas embedded in them or stolen from another language.

I've kind of already 'poked'. https://www. mql5.com/ru/forum/10543#comment_423671

 
Yedelkin:

Programmer's delusion.

Show "programmer's delusion" in your own words first. But somehow everything is criticism-criticism. And the critic's qualification is still unclear.
 
Two brackets mixed up, so much fuss. it's almost like the whole world's criminals.
 
abolk: Show "programmer's delusion" in your presentation first. But somehow everything is criticism-criticism. And the critic's qualification is still not clear.

Your delusion as a programmer's delusion is described in my post, which you deigned to quote only partially. Consider your 'critic's' qualification as zero. - So what?

How can your desire to 'change your status of a critic' change the opinion stated here: https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/10543/page3#comment_424809.

 
Integer: Two brackets mixed up, so much noise. it's almost like the entire world's criminals.
Yeah. Like, 'everyone's entitled to be wrong'? Or have you already forgotten your star theme?
 
Yedelkin:

'Don't shoot the programmer, he's rewriting as best he can'? - No problem, why waste ammunition.

But then let this pianist (programmer) call things by their proper names. For example, not 'Requiem', but 'The Odessa Requiem Joke'. Not'SolarWinds', but an attempt to translate someone else's code written in another programming language. ...Like: Not 'SolarWinds', but 'SolarDreams. Based on someone else's code'.

It's kind of already been poked. https://www. mql5.com/ru/forum/10543#comment_423671

Not enough?

 
Yedelkin:
Yeah. Like, 'everyone's entitled to be wrong'? Or have you already forgotten your star theme?

Why? Who died from these two brackets, or went to prison for 17 years for doing so, as in that star theme?

You are a strange person, Comrade Yedelkin, so you think that here you can't make a mistake with two brackets, but in that topic the investigation and the court could make a mistake and put an innocent man in jail for 17 years.

 
Silent: Not enough?
Fuck. Let's convert into mql5 all achievements of mankind, be it Einstein's fictions or fantasies of a single programmer. Without regard to the original idea itself.
Integer:
Yedelkin: Yeah. Like, 'everyone has the right to be wrong'? Or have you already forgotten your star theme?

Why? Who died from those two brackets, or went to prison for 17 years for doing so, like in that star topic?

You are a strange person, Comrade Yedelkin, so you think you can't make a mistake with two brackets here, but in that topic the investigation and the court could make a mistake and put an innocent man in jail for 17 years.

I see. You've already forgotten your stellar 'everyone has the right to be wrong' theme. And yet you're trying to dictate new terms of understanding of the same subject. Relax, your position is clear to me.
123456789
New comment