Indicators: SolarWinds - page 6

New comment
 
Yedelkin:
I'm not doing well in natrue. Especially when such inadequate opponents pop up.
It's telling. When they have nothing to say, they start paying close attention to typos.
 
Yedelkin:
Why use your fantasies?
Where and what are the fantasies? You are given a list of concrete and real life situations in which you are given the full right to make a mistake.
 

Yedelkin:


Very subtly, you need torethinkthe way you express yourself.

Why take advantage of your fantasies?

I congratulate you. You managed to turn the conversation to personalities. Except you haven't answered the basic question: why would anyone want to adjust to your understanding of self-expression? Not only have you led the discussion away from the topic, but you have also set a new vector for the original topic.
 
Yedelkin:
And you are the same way. It is not necessary to design and fill in the kodobaza to assess your statements as 'pepeza squared'. Or are you still hoping for a 'wizard in a blue helicopter'?

That's right, you are a master. It remains only to learn to understand interlocutors.

As for wizards, I will allow myself not to comment.

 
Integer: It's telling. When you have nothing to say, you start paying close attention to typos.
Your throw-ins are so rapid that you can't keep up with everything. So I have to respond to every throw-in, including the typo throw-in.
 
Yedelkin:
1. I congratulate you. 2. Managed to turn the conversation to personalities. 3. But you have not answered the main question: why should anyone adjust to your understanding of self-expression? 4. Not only did you take the discussion to the side, but you also set a new vector for the original topic.

1. Thank you for the congratulations, but where is the card?

2. So, if a person shows himself/herself in his/her self-expression.

3. Did you ask such a question?

4. Was there any discussion of anything?

If there was, it should have been expressed only in the fact that there is an error in the code, and Godzila would have corrected it silently.

 
Silent: As for wizards, I will allow myself not to comment.
I rate your statement on 5 points. Please be as sensible in the future.
 
Yedelkin:
Your throw-ins are so rapid that you can't keep up with everything. So I have to respond to every throw-in, including the typo throw-in.

"Throw-ins.")

 
Yedelkin:
I rate your statement at 5 points. Please be as sensible in the future.

Don't break the appraiser, you use it too much. Depreciation, you know, all that.

PS Wizards are among us. That's on the thinking.

Good luck.

 
Integer: 1. Thanks for the congratulations, but where is the card?

The card is in the previous message.

Integer: 2. So, if a personality shows itself inappropriately in its self-expression.

Then the personality is inadequate.

Integer: 3. Did you ask such a question?

Has anyone asked the questions you need in this thread?

Integer: 4. Was there any discussion of anything?

It is even strange. that you came into this thread without realising whether there was any 'discussion of something' here. ...Long laugh

123456789
New comment