Indicators: SolarWinds - page 4

New comment
 
Yedelkin:
Fuck. Let's convert into mql5 all achievements of mankind, be it Einstein's fictions or fantasies of a single programmer. Without regard to the original idea. I see. You've already forgotten your star theme about 'everyone has the right to be wrong'. And yet you're trying to dictate new terms of understanding of the same subject. Relax, your position is clear to me.
Is everything okay with your cognitive functioning? cognitive functioning? You're the one proving a point.
 
Yedelkin:
Kickass. 2) Let's convert into mql5 all achievements of mankind, whether they are Einstein's fictions or fantasies of a single programmer.

1) Is it enough or not?

2) It won't hurt me to see the implementation, I'm in favour. Will you do it?

 
Integer:  Is everything okay in there with your, uh. cognitive functioning? You're the one who argued for the right to make a mistake.

I'm glad you've finally realised that there is a right to error.

I hope that a DEEP comprehension of the right to error will not give you any reason to argue that the right to error exists after all :).

 
Yedelkin:

I am glad that you have finally realised the existence of the right to error.

I hope that your deep understanding of the right to error will not give you grounds to argue that the right to error does not exist :).

Boy, you should learn to distinguish a dick from a carrot.
 

Silent:

Yedelkin:
 Fuck. 2) Let's convert into mql5 all achievements of mankind, whether they are Einstein's fictions or fantasies of a single programmer.

1) Is it enough or not?

2) It won't hurt me to see the implementation, I'm in favour. Will you do it?

Kickass squared.

I don't deal with dickheads, especially 'squared'. Did I answer your question?

 
Integer Boy, you gotta learn to tell the difference between a dick and a carrot.
Yeah. You've turned to profanity again. That means it's right on the mark.
 
Yedelkin:
Yeah. You've gone back to swearing. So it's right on the mark.
Which part?
 
Yedelkin:

Kick-ass squared.

I don't do dickheads, especially not 'squared'. Did I answer your question?

Yes. You're incompetent at farts.

That's a shame. If you were, you'd be helping the administration with the design and filling of the kodobaza.

 
Integer: Which point?

To the point of concentration of the brain's stupidity.

Only, I clarify the previous typo: I hope that a deep understanding of the right to error will not give you grounds to argue that the right to error exists:).

 

Yedelkin, how old are you? You're just like a child. Do you have to explain everything on your fingers like a kindergartener? Even these contrasting examples don't help.

For example, if a person is dialling a telephone number, of course he has the right to make a mistake, no problems will arise from a wrongly dialled number (except for rare cases), you can take and redial the number.

If the sapper is removing a mine from the ground.... here. I don't mind at all, you can use your right to make mistakes in such situations as much as you like and to the fullest extent.

123456789
New comment