MetaForecast M5
199 USD
Demo heruntergeladen:
539
Veröffentlicht:
19 März 2023
Aktuelle Version:
3.6
Keinen passenden Roboter gefunden?
Geben Sie Ihren Eigenen in Auftrag
auf Freelance!
Gehen Sie zu Freelance
Geben Sie Ihren Eigenen in Auftrag
auf Freelance!
Wie man einen Roboter oder Indikator kaufen kann
Starte Deinen EA im
Virtual Hosting
Virtual Hosting
Teste einen Indikator/Roboter vor dem Kauf
Möchtest Du Geld im Market verdienen?
Wie man Produkte richtig präsentiert
Sie verpassen Handelsmöglichkeiten:
- Freie Handelsapplikationen
- Über 8.000 Signale zum Kopieren
- Wirtschaftsnachrichten für die Lage an den Finanzmärkte
Registrierung
Einloggen
Sie stimmen der Website-Richtlinie und den Nutzungsbedingungen zu.
Wenn Sie kein Benutzerkonto haben, registrieren Sie sich

Subject: Request for Detailed Clarification on Data Utilization in MetaForecast
Dear Vahidreza,
I hope this message finds you well. I've been diligently trying to optimize the use of the MetaForecast indicator, particularly understanding how the training data is structured and utilized, especially in relation to the Past Size and Layers settings.
I have configured the indicator with a Past Size of 10,000 bars and a Layers setting of [1000, 2000, 100]. From our previous discussions, it is my understanding that MetaForecast uses Past Size plus Input Size amount of data, totaling 11,000 bars in this setup. Could you please clarify exactly how these bars are utilized for training the neural network?
To ensure clarity in our discussion, let's define each bar on the chart as follows:
Given this naming convention, could you specify which exact bars are used for training? For instance, does the training use data from shift = 1 to shift = 10,000 ?
Additionally, you mentioned that MetaForecast does not know the future of the last 1,000 bars. Could you specify which bars these are? Would they be from shift = 10,000 to shift = 11,000 ? How are these bars handled during the training process? Are they used as a form of out-of-sample testing to gauge the model’s predictive accuracy, or do they serve another purpose?
Understanding these details will greatly enhance my ability to use MetaForecast effectively and contribute a well-informed positive review. I am genuinely enthusiastic about the capabilities of your tool and eager to fully grasp its operational mechanics.
Thank you very much for your time and assistance. 😊👍
Best regards,
Lev
Thank you