Yalnızca ürünü satın alan veya kiralayan kullanıcılar yorum yazabilir
Phathutshedzo Tshivhasa  

😂😂😂 Guys sellers deal with all kinds of energy on MQL5. Reviews are used as tools of even scamming sellers, the screenshot that I have that this person sent it's the EA performed 3 winning trades and 1 trade that was floating in negative at that point it was -$30. The details are by the side of reviews. I will not change my respond of a review after he has changed his review as promised. 😂😂😂I give up we deal with all kinds of energy on MQL5 


Rodrigo Benites De Moraes  

VT market and blackbull - spread low and ECN account guys, try this, picture from 27/11/2025

Phathutshedzo Tshivhasa  
Rodrigo Benites De Moraes #:

XAU M1 - recovery disable, for me work nice


Awesome. Can see you didn't make any changes on the set file and didn't intervene manually that's why your results and profit is demonstrating what GVolt is capable of 
Cristian Mari  
I’m posting this so people can see the REAL performance of this EA, not the fantasy the seller advertises. I’ve attached a screenshot from my live account: starting with €300, the EA immediately pushed me into more than €30 of drawdown. If it behaves like this with a small balance, it would wipe out a larger account even faster.

The EA is unstable, extremely risky, and completely unreliable. It does the opposite of what is promised and exposes the account to dangerous levels of drawdown. Nothing about its real behavior matches the way it is advertised.

Crucial information — like the actual leverage requirements and the risks involved — was not clearly disclosed before purchase. This is unacceptable for anyone selling a trading system.

Based on my experience, I strongly warn others: do not rely on this EA, and do not risk your money on it. The results speak for themselves, and they are nothing like what the seller claims.
Phathutshedzo Tshivhasa  
Cristian Mari #:
I’m posting this so people can see the REAL performance of this EA, not the fantasy the seller advertises. I’ve attached a screenshot from my live account: starting with €300, the EA immediately pushed me into more than €30 of drawdown. If it behaves like this with a small balance, it would wipe out a larger account even faster.

The EA is unstable, extremely risky, and completely unreliable. It does the opposite of what is promised and exposes the account to dangerous levels of drawdown. Nothing about its real behavior matches the way it is advertised.

Crucial information — like the actual leverage requirements and the risks involved — was not clearly disclosed before purchase. This is unacceptable for anyone selling a trading system.

Based on my experience, I strongly warn others: do not rely on this EA, and do not risk your money on it. The results speak for themselves, and they are nothing like what the seller claims.
Are you blind? Screenshots just above your comment is the results of a user who followed the instructions and check even in the record there is even negative $40 but the EA maintained making profit. I don't know what you are trying to make a point of here, it's like you are speaking to blind people who doesn't what's right in front of them. That is why there is even a live signal showing the history that it even takes hits. i don't know what it is you are trying to accomplish but you are trying too hard 😂😂😂 Attached proof of the discussion before using the EA of the leverage
EA--TESTER--REALMONEY  
News Filter doesn´t work! ERROR_TXT IN WebRequest! You should fix the bugs when you want to go on with your EA. You are losing trust!
Phathutshedzo Tshivhasa  
DNkRockzzzzZ #:
News Filter doesn´t work! ERROR_TXT IN WebRequest! You should fix the bugs when you want to go on with your EA. You are losing trust!
You are getting that error because you didn't receive the link of the news filter. Secondly when you are using Grid mode, activating news filter will be preventing it from performing grid. We added that function News Filter, we are still confirming and testing the EA even on a live account whether it is really stable using Cut_Loss as a SL converting it into non-grid EA and having to avoid trading during news. The instruction of activating news filter was not sent to anyone except the ones who requested the link and wanting to trade Non-Grid which at this point we are still advising against turning grid by applying Cut_Loss which is when you be in need of using news filter. Even the live signals, news filter is not activated but if you insist using the news filter private message me I'll send you the instruction on how activate it and the WebRequest link of it
EA--TESTER--REALMONEY  
Phathutshedzo Tshivhasa #:
You are getting that error because you didn't receive the link of the news filter. Secondly when you are using Grid mode, activating news filter will be preventing it from performing grid. We added that function News Filter, we are still confirming and testing the EA even on a live account whether it is really stable using Cut_Loss as a SL converting it into non-grid EA and having to avoid trading during news. The instruction of activating news filter was not sent to anyone except the ones who requested the link and wanting to trade Non-Grid which at this point we are still advising against turning grid by applying Cut_Loss which is when you be in need of using news filter. Even the live signals, news filter is not activated but if you insist using the news filter private message me I'll send you the instruction on how activate it and the WebRequest link of it
Ok what about the Recovery function?
Phathutshedzo Tshivhasa  
DNkRockzzzzZ #:
Ok what about the Recovery function?
Recovery mode it will also be for non-grid EA. If you switch on recovery mode on the grid, it will be increasing lot size within grid meaning that it is grid with martingale and it won't even be in a manner that you will understand the increment of it because it's not a multiple of grid, it's a fixed increment. Those functions they fall under what we are finalizing on how they should be used and work in harmony. If you activate it on a grid because it's not meant for grid it will on make a mess. This function of non-grid and the inputs of non-grid, when we have finalized them as we are testing on our live account which is not linked to MQL5, we don't want users to start using something that we haven't yet confirmed. When we have reached the final conclusion of how non-grid and its recovery should work, we will not only just inform the users, we'll also write it on the description. That is why the set file we have sent you is only grid mode without recovery mode on cause grid on its own it does recovery. You can wait for testing those mode and backtesting them until the developer team has finalized on them. This discussion it's a discussion clearing to understand the EA, can we continue in the private messages?
EA--TESTER--REALMONEY  
Phathutshedzo Tshivhasa #:
Recovery mode it will also be for non-grid EA. If you switch on recovery mode on the grid, it will be increasing lot size within grid meaning that it is grid with martingale and it won't even be in a manner that you will understand the increment of it because it's not a multiple of grid, it's a fixed increment. Those functions they fall under what we are finalizing on how they should be used and work in harmony. If you activate it on a grid because it's not meant for grid it will on make a mess. This function of non-grid and the inputs of non-grid, when we have finalized them as we are testing on our live account which is not linked to MQL5, we don't want users to start using something that we haven't yet confirmed. When we have reached the final conclusion of how non-grid and its recovery should work, we will not only just inform the users, we'll also write it on the description. That is why the set file we have sent you is only grid mode without recovery mode on cause grid on its own it does recovery. You can wait for testing those mode and backtesting them until the developer team has finalized on them. This discussion it's a discussion clearing to understand the EA, can we continue in the private messages?
Why in private I think this informations are important for all the possible clients so they don´t need to ask you too over and over again for the same things.
Marco Scherer  

Oh too bad, I bought the EA right before the discount promo, ouch :p
But what I actually wanted to say is: I’ve now tested the EA for hours using real ticks. Man, that took ages, but here are the insights:

1min = extremely risky, but max profit, must run with no DD limit
5min = same as 1min, trades are 90% identical
15min = trades are very well positioned, much lower DD
30min = the safe version, but with fewer positions

In my opinion, the best approach is to run the EA on +15min, and on a second account where DD isn’t an issue, run it on 1min.

EA--TESTER--REALMONEY  
Marco Scherer #:

Oh too bad, I bought the EA right before the discount promo, ouch :p
But what I actually wanted to say is: I’ve now tested the EA for hours using real ticks. Man, that took ages, but here are the insights:

1min = extremely risky, but max profit, must run with no DD limit
5min = same as 1min, trades are 90% identical
15min = trades are very well positioned, much lower DD
30min = the safe version, but with fewer positions

In my opinion, the best approach is to run the EA on +15min, and on a second account where DD isn’t an issue, run it on 1min.

Why 1 min without DD limit? That´s very risky in my opinion.
Marco Scherer  
DNkRockzzzzZ #:
Why 1 min without DD limit? That´s very risky in my opinion.In the 1-minute chart he often opened positions like this. Bottom candle and Sell, then the price immediately reversed, and by the time the price was back in profit he had already closed 3 other Buy positions. So it’s very possible that the drawdown of that single Sell is higher than the profit of the other positions. You can therefore have 20 good trades and 1 bad one that falls into your drawdown and makes all the other 20 trades useless and ruins them. And in the backtest the EA also opens only one position per candle, so in the 15-minute chart you have 1 trade, while in the 1-minute chart during the same time you have the chance for 15 more.

In the 1-minute chart he often opened positions like this. Bottom candle and Sell, then the price immediately reversed, and by the time the price was back in profit he had already closed 3 other Buy positions. So it’s very possible that the drawdown of that single Sell is higher than the profit of the other positions. You can therefore have 20 good trades and 1 bad one that falls into your drawdown and makes all the other 20 trades useless and ruins them. And in the backtest the EA also opens only one position per candle, so in the 15-minute chart you have 1 trade, while in the 1-minute chart during the same time you have the chance for 15 more.

EA--TESTER--REALMONEY  
But it makes no sense, when for example it opens a sell trade and after that it pumps up higher and higher and opens another sell because of martingale and another. This positions will never ever be closed and the swap will work against you too every day. In a bull run It will blow up the account.
Marco Scherer  
DNkRockzzzzZ #:
But it makes no sense, when for example it opens a sell trade and after that it pumps up higher and higher and opens another sell because of martingale and another. This positions will never ever be closed and the swap will work against you too every day. In a bull run It will blow up the account.

Yes, of course, but on the 1-minute chart it’s rather unlikely. Eventually the price will come down and it will be able to close the trade, but what’s really meant is this: if you set a 5 percent drawdown, meaning you accept a 5 percent loss of the account, then it will close the position immediately at that point. That might mean you end up with –500 dollars, while a normal trade only makes around 25 dollars profit. Now you can calculate how long it takes to get from –500 back to zero, just because you set a max DD on the 1-minute chart, which has extreme volatility.

That’s why you should run something like this on a second account, where you can withdraw profits, and eventually only trade with money you don’t care about losing. Even if it hits, for example, a 50 percent drawdown before ending in profit.

EA--TESTER--REALMONEY  
Marco Scherer #:

Yes, of course, but on the 1-minute chart it’s rather unlikely. Eventually the price will come down and it will be able to close the trade, but what’s really meant is this: if you set a 5 percent drawdown, meaning you accept a 5 percent loss of the account, then it will close the position immediately at that point. That might mean you end up with –500 dollars, while a normal trade only makes around 25 dollars profit. Now you can calculate how long it takes to get from –500 back to zero, just because you set a max DD on the 1-minute chart, which has extreme volatility.

That’s why you should run something like this on a second account, where you can withdraw profits, and eventually only trade with money you don’t care about losing. Even if it hits, for example, a 50 percent drawdown before ending in profit.

Yes you are right.
Marco Scherer  

Let’s see how the EA handles this. I also find it questionable why it opened a buy at the top but never triggered a sell on the way down, even though it’s dropping so sharply.



Marco Scherer  
Marco Scherer #:

Let’s see how the EA handles this. I also find it questionable why it opened a buy at the top but never triggered a sell on the way down, even though it’s dropping so sharply.



Oh, there was a CME issue — the entire gold market didn’t have proper data. But hey, I got out with $0.00, I closed the position manually. Today is a bad day for trading.
Yo-san  

It was a demo, so it was fine, but in just 4 minutes, 250 orders were placed and my funds were gone. He said he would fix it and that he had, but it hasn't been fixed at all. I think it would be best to stop using this EA immediately, since you never know what conditions it will trigger.

4minutes, 250orders

Yalnızca ürünü satın alan veya kiralayan kullanıcılar yorum yazabilir