GVolt
159 USD
Démo téléchargée:
632
Publié:
17 novembre 2025
Version actuelle:
2.7
Vous ne trouvez aucun robot qui vous convient ?
Commandez le vôtre
dans la section Freelance
Aller à la section Freelance
Commandez le vôtre
dans la section Freelance
Comment acheter un robot de trading ou un indicateur
Exécutez votre EA sur
hébergement virtuel
hébergement virtuel
Test un indicateur/robot de trading avant d'acheter
Vous voulez gagner de l'argent sur Market ?
Comment présenter un produit pour qu'il se vende bien
Vous manquez des opportunités de trading :
- Applications de trading gratuites
- Plus de 8 000 signaux à copier
- Actualités économiques pour explorer les marchés financiers
Inscription
Se connecter
Vous acceptez la politique du site Web et les conditions d'utilisation
Si vous n'avez pas de compte, veuillez vous inscrire
😂😂😂 Guys sellers deal with all kinds of energy on MQL5. Reviews are used as tools of even scamming sellers, the screenshot that I have that this person sent it's the EA performed 3 winning trades and 1 trade that was floating in negative at that point it was -$30. The details are by the side of reviews. I will not change my respond of a review after he has changed his review as promised. 😂😂😂I give up we deal with all kinds of energy on MQL5
XAU M1 - recovery disable, for me work nice
VT market and blackbull - spread low and ECN account guys, try this, picture from 27/11/2025
XAU M1 - recovery disable, for me work nice
I’m posting this so people can see the REAL performance of this EA, not the fantasy the seller advertises. I’ve attached a screenshot from my live account: starting with €300, the EA immediately pushed me into more than €30 of drawdown. If it behaves like this with a small balance, it would wipe out a larger account even faster.
News Filter doesn´t work! ERROR_TXT IN WebRequest! You should fix the bugs when you want to go on with your EA. You are losing trust!
You are getting that error because you didn't receive the link of the news filter. Secondly when you are using Grid mode, activating news filter will be preventing it from performing grid. We added that function News Filter, we are still confirming and testing the EA even on a live account whether it is really stable using Cut_Loss as a SL converting it into non-grid EA and having to avoid trading during news. The instruction of activating news filter was not sent to anyone except the ones who requested the link and wanting to trade Non-Grid which at this point we are still advising against turning grid by applying Cut_Loss which is when you be in need of using news filter. Even the live signals, news filter is not activated but if you insist using the news filter private message me I'll send you the instruction on how activate it and the WebRequest link of it
Ok what about the Recovery function?
Recovery mode it will also be for non-grid EA. If you switch on recovery mode on the grid, it will be increasing lot size within grid meaning that it is grid with martingale and it won't even be in a manner that you will understand the increment of it because it's not a multiple of grid, it's a fixed increment. Those functions they fall under what we are finalizing on how they should be used and work in harmony. If you activate it on a grid because it's not meant for grid it will on make a mess. This function of non-grid and the inputs of non-grid, when we have finalized them as we are testing on our live account which is not linked to MQL5, we don't want users to start using something that we haven't yet confirmed. When we have reached the final conclusion of how non-grid and its recovery should work, we will not only just inform the users, we'll also write it on the description. That is why the set file we have sent you is only grid mode without recovery mode on cause grid on its own it does recovery. You can wait for testing those mode and backtesting them until the developer team has finalized on them. This discussion it's a discussion clearing to understand the EA, can we continue in the private messages?
Oh too bad, I bought the EA right before the discount promo, ouch :p
But what I actually wanted to say is: I’ve now tested the EA for hours using real ticks. Man, that took ages, but here are the insights:
1min = extremely risky, but max profit, must run with no DD limit
5min = same as 1min, trades are 90% identical
15min = trades are very well positioned, much lower DD
30min = the safe version, but with fewer positions
In my opinion, the best approach is to run the EA on +15min, and on a second account where DD isn’t an issue, run it on 1min.
Oh too bad, I bought the EA right before the discount promo, ouch :p
But what I actually wanted to say is: I’ve now tested the EA for hours using real ticks. Man, that took ages, but here are the insights:
1min = extremely risky, but max profit, must run with no DD limit
5min = same as 1min, trades are 90% identical
15min = trades are very well positioned, much lower DD
30min = the safe version, but with fewer positions
In my opinion, the best approach is to run the EA on +15min, and on a second account where DD isn’t an issue, run it on 1min.
Why 1 min without DD limit? That´s very risky in my opinion.In the 1-minute chart he often opened positions like this. Bottom candle and Sell, then the price immediately reversed, and by the time the price was back in profit he had already closed 3 other Buy positions. So it’s very possible that the drawdown of that single Sell is higher than the profit of the other positions. You can therefore have 20 good trades and 1 bad one that falls into your drawdown and makes all the other 20 trades useless and ruins them. And in the backtest the EA also opens only one position per candle, so in the 15-minute chart you have 1 trade, while in the 1-minute chart during the same time you have the chance for 15 more.
In the 1-minute chart he often opened positions like this. Bottom candle and Sell, then the price immediately reversed, and by the time the price was back in profit he had already closed 3 other Buy positions. So it’s very possible that the drawdown of that single Sell is higher than the profit of the other positions. You can therefore have 20 good trades and 1 bad one that falls into your drawdown and makes all the other 20 trades useless and ruins them. And in the backtest the EA also opens only one position per candle, so in the 15-minute chart you have 1 trade, while in the 1-minute chart during the same time you have the chance for 15 more.
But it makes no sense, when for example it opens a sell trade and after that it pumps up higher and higher and opens another sell because of martingale and another. This positions will never ever be closed and the swap will work against you too every day. In a bull run It will blow up the account.
Yes, of course, but on the 1-minute chart it’s rather unlikely. Eventually the price will come down and it will be able to close the trade, but what’s really meant is this: if you set a 5 percent drawdown, meaning you accept a 5 percent loss of the account, then it will close the position immediately at that point. That might mean you end up with –500 dollars, while a normal trade only makes around 25 dollars profit. Now you can calculate how long it takes to get from –500 back to zero, just because you set a max DD on the 1-minute chart, which has extreme volatility.
That’s why you should run something like this on a second account, where you can withdraw profits, and eventually only trade with money you don’t care about losing. Even if it hits, for example, a 50 percent drawdown before ending in profit.
Yes, of course, but on the 1-minute chart it’s rather unlikely. Eventually the price will come down and it will be able to close the trade, but what’s really meant is this: if you set a 5 percent drawdown, meaning you accept a 5 percent loss of the account, then it will close the position immediately at that point. That might mean you end up with –500 dollars, while a normal trade only makes around 25 dollars profit. Now you can calculate how long it takes to get from –500 back to zero, just because you set a max DD on the 1-minute chart, which has extreme volatility.
That’s why you should run something like this on a second account, where you can withdraw profits, and eventually only trade with money you don’t care about losing. Even if it hits, for example, a 50 percent drawdown before ending in profit.
Let’s see how the EA handles this. I also find it questionable why it opened a buy at the top but never triggered a sell on the way down, even though it’s dropping so sharply.
Let’s see how the EA handles this. I also find it questionable why it opened a buy at the top but never triggered a sell on the way down, even though it’s dropping so sharply.
It was a demo, so it was fine, but in just 4 minutes, 250 orders were placed and my funds were gone. He said he would fix it and that he had, but it hasn't been fixed at all. I think it would be best to stop using this EA immediately, since you never know what conditions it will trigger.