---
🍀 Good Luck & Big Profits

Hello, my friends. I finally succeeded to release the indicator on August 14.

In the coming days, I think there will be a few more versions with improvements. For example, I want to add the ability to save optimizations not only for each individual currency pair or instrument, but also for each timeframe of these instruments. Optimization works only for strategy 1 so far. As for strategy 2, now I'm making additional improvements in it, which will make it more perfect. I don't know yet if it will succeed to make it optimizable – we will see a little later. Do not switch timeframe during optimization!

Thank you all for your anticipation and patience, I'm literally “falling off my feet” from the work I've done, but I'm happy I did it. More interesting things to come. Some later, there will also be a detailed description of how to use the new version of the indicator, as well as how to use the presets to integrate the indicator with external EA's.

If you notice any problems with the new version, please send me a private message so that I can mark it.

About High Time Frame (HTF) Filter:

Detailed articles with examples of using the new features of the indicator in the process of creation. I was in such a hurry to share the new version with you that I didn't wait until I had finished the articles and manuals to share the indicator as soon as possible.

---

🍀 Good Luck & Big Profits

🌟 🆕 UPDATE: SCALPER INSIDE PRO v3.52 🌟

🔺🔻🔺🔻🔺🔻🔺🔻🔺🔻🔺🔻🔺🔻🔺🔻

v3.52 - What's New

▪ Updates and improvements to the optimization module

▪ Optimizing and improving the HTF-Filter

🔺🔻🔺🔻🔺🔻🔺🔻🔺🔻🔺🔻🔺🔻🔺🔻

An improvement in the HTF-filter module allows us to give profits to grow and avoid faulty signals.

If we see a Buy signal from Scalper Inside PRO, but the HTF-Filter shows an opposite trend, it is better to avoid such a position!

---

Getting very upset of this kind of signals. turn almost dirtectly against you....

Happens all the time. This a scalper right, no to stay in the trade for hours/days and hit SL.

I'm out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hi Ron

Yes, of course, failures frustrate and hinder us. But, unfortunately, that's how trading is. We cannot be right 100% of the time. And the market is not 100% algorithmic. I've been doing this for many years, but I also make mistakes—non-attention, lack of time to fully analyze, and just a bad mood – all these things can and do get in the way from time to time. But that's no reason to fall into panic, in any case. Practice solves many problems, the main thing is not to give in to emotions.

Here is an example of my trades today:

- WTF Alex, how about this fact, that HFT-Filter is continued showing downtrend? — I'm asking for myself, - Why did you close the position?

- Simply because, Alex – answering Me. :-)

Because it seemed – it seemed to me – that the price is now at the TP2 level, and we would not go further at once, and I prepared to open an additional position at a better price. I was wrong in my expectations, so what? We draw conclusions and move on with that knowledge. I could have either to trail the position, closed part of it, or moved it to breakeven. Do I blame myself - no. Let's move on… Well, maybe I do blame myself, but just a little bit… :-)

---

Next example:

There are several mistakes here. Yes, the opening of the position is generally not bad. I missed the exit when the HFT-Filter started showing a downtrend.  I could have cut my losses. All right, it happens.

I opened the next trade with a slightly larger lot and this time I managed to profit into TP3 Level with the HFT-Filter.

Mistakes, good decisions, mistakes again, good decisions again... This sequence is endless; our task is just to make sure that the sum of our successes is greater than the sum of losses. And this is practice. My task as a trader and programmer is to algorithmic everything so that it becomes as simple and understandable as possible. I strive to do this by simplifying many points, which require deep and significant analysis. But in any case, I, and no one algorithm – not replace a practice, which erases all obstacles allows us to become confident and successful. And this applies not only to trading.

---

Hi madstaff

---

Hi. Oh, thanks for reminding me. I'll add that to the new version.

Hi Alexey,

thank you very much for another amazing upgrade. One of the developers here who really cares about the product and the customers. So happy with your products and your work. Please keep it up and all the best for you :) 

Hi Alexey,

I was checking another broker to see if the spread could be better, but no I see different results on the same pair:

Which is better or the correct? Top is IC Market, below is Fusion Market

Hi Ron.

The trick is that the results should not be fundamentally different. My advice is not to chase the spread, as it is not as critical. Unless, of course, you take a really awful spread, which will not be so easy to overcome. But in most cases, it will be a normal spread, which might widen closer to important news releases or tighten during a flat. This is not so easy to use and analyze it. Therefore, it is more important to focus on signals and levels. If you see an extremely wide spread, or the price has gone too far, then skip such entries just in case, if you are not sure.

I don't think I fully understood your question about: “Which is better or the correct?“ 

Honestly, I don't see any gross problems in your examples, and why should there be any at all? Here are my screenshots, for example—broker Alpari:

p.s. And just some words for everyone. Now I am finishing some last nuances, about which you write to me in private messages (by the way, thanks to all who send me private messages with some comments and corrections—together we are power). And by the end I will make the final description of all the features with examples. In particular, it was noticed that if the terminal has just been launched and there are not enough quotes, then there may be not a completely correct drawing due to the peculiarities of the initialization of the indicator ( which fixes by switching the time frame) . The peculiarity is that the indicator works in a flow and, in contrast to the EA, you cannot control the moment of immediate readiness of the terminal (because the indicator does not depend on the arrival of ticks). But I already have an idea how to do it with a special initialization mode. In the next couple of days I will make all corrections. Thank you all.

---

What I mean is that you get a sell signal at one broker while the broker is still green (no signal). I saw that with some other pair, so then you're wondering if you should follow the signal or not. It has nothing to do with spreading.

Oh, Ron, I apologize for my inattention. I thought the screenshots were sequential, and I didn't see the time correctly, so I thought they were just sequential signals after some time. Now I see what you mean. Thanks for the clarification. 

The indicator gives us a signal, after analyzing a large amount of data, obtained from both the current and higher time frames. If some broker has a significant difference in quotes – for example, quotes are less filtered, then of course there may be some difference in the received signals. I always check everything with different brokers, but I have not noticed such differences for this strategy so far. 

Here it is worth observing this effect. If it is a normal situation in a small difference in the quotes, then the signals of these two brokers may change places – sometime at one broker the signal may appear earlier, and sometime at the other. But if an indicator at one broker always gives a signal earlier, it means that its quotation is always different and not temporary. And this already says that it quite successful situation to find a broker, at which the signal is triggered earlier. 

But I think that all the same it will be an effect “from time to time”, so you can just choose a broker convenient for you and, other things being approximately equal (number of trades, WR%) trade with him.

---

Hi Med Abd.

I would like to take this opportunity to answer your question and at the same time tell you all about the update that will be released in the next few days. I apologize for not sharing the news with you for a long time, but I was busy improving the indicator again. But I think you won't mind because at the end of the day, it is all done for all of us and to get the best results. I was making the next version and again saw an opportunity for improvement. And as a result, I decided to give the next version the serial number v3.55 instead of v3.53. Moreover, I'm making a MT5-version of the indicator at the same time, so that all the innovations were in both versions at once.

As for your question about calculating the lot, of course I thought about it. But since this is not an EA, but an indicator, I planned to leave these calculations for an EA-assistant, which I plan to do after the release of the MT5-version of the indicator. But ok, if it's an important addition, I'll keep that idea in the plans for the next versions.

---

Ok, I got it, and will fix it. Thanks.