Valutazione dei core della CPU per l'ottimizzazione - pagina 7

 

Quindi, ancora una volta ho ricompilato tutti e tre gli EA.

Intel Core i7-8700, 3.2GHz, 16Gb RAM, 6 core.

Hyperthreading abilitato.

Sei agenti, Tree_Brut_TestPL:

2019.08.13 16:19:02.912 Core 03 pass 2 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:33.050
2019.08.13 16:19:02.943 Core 01 pass 0 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:33.127
2019.08.13 16:19:03.032 Core 02 pass 5 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:33.166
2019.08.13 16:19:03.238 Core 06 pass 4 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:33.372
2019.08.13 16:19:03.565 Core 04 pass 3 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:33.703
2019.08.13 16:19:03.784 Core 11 pass 1 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:33.947

Dodici agenti, Tree_Brut_TestPL:

2019.08.13 16:24:28.900 Core 12 pass 11 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:01:43.168
2019.08.13 16:24:29.595 Core 05 pass 10 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:01:43.898
2019.08.13 16:24:29.897 Core 03 pass 2 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:01:44.675
2019.08.13 16:24:30.425 Core 10 pass 8 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:01:44.806
2019.08.13 16:24:30.488 Core 02 pass 1 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:01:45.264
2019.08.13 16:24:30.635 Core 09 pass 5 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:01:45.405
2019.08.13 16:24:30.720 Core 08 pass 7 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:01:45.122
2019.08.13 16:24:30.721 Core 06 pass 4 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:01:45.497
2019.08.13 16:24:31.081 Core 07 pass 9 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:01:45.422
2019.08.13 16:24:31.882 Core 01 pass 0 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:01:46.660
2019.08.13 16:24:31.992 Core 11 pass 6 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:01:46.769
2019.08.13 16:24:32.075 Core 04 pass 3 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:01:46.852
2019.08.13 16:24:32.075 Tester  optimization finished, total passes 12
2019.08.13 16:24:32.086 Statistics      optimization done in 1 minutes 47 seconds
2019.08.13 16:24:32.086 Statistics      shortest pass 0:01:43.168, longest pass 0:01:46.852, average pass 0:01:45.294

Sei agenti, Tree_Brut_TestPL_F:

2019.08.13 16:27:35.754 Core 01 pass 0 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:01:16.198
2019.08.13 16:27:35.969 Core 06 pass 5 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:01:16.423
2019.08.13 16:27:36.112 Core 04 pass 3 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:01:16.577
2019.08.13 16:27:36.246 Core 03 pass 2 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:01:16.764
2019.08.13 16:27:36.374 Core 02 pass 1 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:01:16.905
2019.08.13 16:27:37.184 Core 05 pass 4 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:01:17.664
2019.08.13 16:27:37.184 Tester  optimization finished, total passes 6
2019.08.13 16:27:37.194 Statistics      optimization done in 1 minutes 19 seconds
2019.08.13 16:27:37.194 Statistics      shortest pass 0:01:16.198, longest pass 0:01:17.664, average pass 0:01:16.755

Dodici agenti, Tree_Brut_TestPL_F:

2019.08.13 16:36:28.083 Core 11 pass 7 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:03:18.279
2019.08.13 16:36:28.473 Core 05 pass 5 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:03:18.672
2019.08.13 16:36:28.525 Core 01 pass 0 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:03:18.724
2019.08.13 16:36:29.260 Core 04 pass 2 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:03:19.459
2019.08.13 16:36:30.106 Core 10 pass 10 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:03:20.305
2019.08.13 16:36:30.865 Core 08 pass 6 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:03:21.064
2019.08.13 16:36:31.414 Core 06 pass 8 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:03:21.613
2019.08.13 16:36:31.556 Core 12 pass 11 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:03:21.754
2019.08.13 16:36:31.894 Core 03 pass 4 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:03:22.094
2019.08.13 16:36:33.473 Core 02 pass 1 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:03:23.673
2019.08.13 16:36:35.412 Core 09 pass 9 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:03:25.612
2019.08.13 16:36:35.493 Core 07 pass 3 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:03:25.693
2019.08.13 16:36:35.493 Tester  optimization finished, total passes 12
2019.08.13 16:36:35.503 Statistics      optimization done in 3 minutes 26 seconds
2019.08.13 16:36:35.503 Statistics      shortest pass 0:03:18.279, longest pass 0:03:25.693, average pass 0:03:21.411

Sei agenti, Tree_Brut_TestPL_F_Fast:

2019.08.13 16:39:28.522 Core 02 pass 1 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:16.755
2019.08.13 16:39:28.549 Core 03 pass 2 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:16.781
2019.08.13 16:39:29.010 Core 06 pass 5 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:17.247
2019.08.13 16:39:29.085 Core 01 pass 0 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:17.375
2019.08.13 16:39:29.607 Core 04 pass 3 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:17.821
2019.08.13 16:39:29.716 Core 05 pass 4 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:17.996
2019.08.13 16:39:29.716 Tester  optimization finished, total passes 6
2019.08.13 16:39:29.726 Statistics      optimization done in 0 minutes 18 seconds
2019.08.13 16:39:29.726 Statistics      shortest pass 0:00:16.755, longest pass 0:00:17.996, average pass 0:00:17.329

Dodici agenti, Tree_Brut_TestPL_F_Fast:

2019.08.13 16:41:11.638 Core 04 pass 3 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:29.382
2019.08.13 16:41:11.827 Core 06 pass 5 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:29.573
2019.08.13 16:41:12.313 Core 02 pass 1 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:30.060
2019.08.13 16:41:12.826 Core 07 pass 9 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:30.030
2019.08.13 16:41:12.907 Core 08 pass 6 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:30.115
2019.08.13 16:41:13.695 Core 01 pass 0 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:31.442
2019.08.13 16:41:13.927 Core 05 pass 4 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:31.673
2019.08.13 16:41:13.964 Core 09 pass 7 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:31.219
2019.08.13 16:41:15.006 Core 03 pass 2 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:32.752
2019.08.13 16:41:15.381 Core 10 pass 10 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:32.558
2019.08.13 16:41:16.244 Core 11 pass 8 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:33.420
2019.08.13 16:41:16.365 Core 12 pass 11 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:33.536
2019.08.13 16:41:16.365 Tester  optimization finished, total passes 12
2019.08.13 16:41:16.376 Statistics      optimization done in 0 minutes 34 seconds
2019.08.13 16:41:16.376 Statistics      shortest pass 0:00:29.382, longest pass 0:00:33.536, average pass 0:00:31.313

Spegnere l'hypertrading.

Sei agenti, Tree_Brut_TestPL:

2019.08.13 16:46:06.369 Core 5  pass 2 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:37.248
2019.08.13 16:46:06.958 Core 1  pass 0 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:37.861
2019.08.13 16:46:07.391 Core 6  pass 1 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:38.282
2019.08.13 16:46:07.722 Core 4  pass 4 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:38.611
2019.08.13 16:46:08.158 Core 3  pass 3 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:39.045
2019.08.13 16:46:08.305 Core 2  pass 5 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:39.164
2019.08.13 16:46:08.305 Tester  optimization finished, total passes 6
2019.08.13 16:46:08.316 Statistics      optimization done in 0 minutes 40 seconds
2019.08.13 16:46:08.316 Statistics      shortest pass 0:00:37.248, longest pass 0:00:39.164, average pass 0:00:38.368

Sei agenti, Tree_Brut_TestPL_F:

2019.08.13 16:53:21.112 Core 6  pass 3 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:01:10.789
2019.08.13 16:53:21.517 Core 1  pass 1 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:01:11.240
2019.08.13 16:53:21.660 Core 2  pass 0 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:01:11.523
2019.08.13 16:53:21.993 Core 4  pass 5 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:01:11.648
2019.08.13 16:53:22.054 Core 5  pass 4 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:01:11.713
2019.08.13 16:53:22.951 Core 3  pass 2 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:01:12.710
2019.08.13 16:53:22.951 Tester  optimization finished, total passes 6
2019.08.13 16:53:22.961 Statistics      optimization done in 1 minutes 13 seconds
2019.08.13 16:53:22.961 Statistics      shortest pass 0:01:10.789, longest pass 0:01:12.710, average pass 0:01:11.603

Sei agenti, Tree_Brut_TestPL_F_Fast:

2019.08.13 16:54:51.756 Core 3  pass 0 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:14.678
2019.08.13 16:54:51.810 Core 4  pass 4 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:14.727
2019.08.13 16:54:51.842 Core 2  pass 3 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:14.765
2019.08.13 16:54:51.873 Core 5  pass 1 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:14.881
2019.08.13 16:54:51.939 Core 6  pass 5 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:14.856
2019.08.13 16:54:51.961 Core 1  pass 2 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:00:14.915
2019.08.13 16:54:51.961 Tester  optimization finished, total passes 6
2019.08.13 16:54:51.972 Statistics      optimization done in 0 minutes 15 seconds
2019.08.13 16:54:51.972 Statistics      shortest pass 0:00:14.678, longest pass 0:00:14.915, average pass 0:00:14.803
 
Aleksey Vyazmikin:

Grazie, ma aggiungete i risultati di Tree_Brut_TestPL_F e Tree_Brut_TestPL per la valutazione!

compila naturalmente lungo))) ho visto solo allora la quantità di codice!

Albero_Brut_TestPL

4 agenti 8 passaggi

Q       0       20:33:03.992    Core 3  pass 2 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:01:28.086
DF      0       20:33:06.162    Core 2  pass 0 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:01:30.305
DL      0       20:33:06.954    Core 1  pass 4 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:01:31.043
KE      0       20:33:06.998    Core 4  pass 6 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:01:31.025
EK      0       20:34:33.114    Core 3  pass 3 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:01:29.133
DP      0       20:34:36.197    Core 2  pass 1 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:01:30.045
GI      0       20:34:37.233    Core 4  pass 7 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:01:30.244
RO      0       20:34:37.410    Core 1  pass 5 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:01:30.465
KK      0       20:34:37.410    Tester  optimization finished, total passes 8
GO      0       20:34:37.420    Statistics      optimization done in 3 minutes 02 seconds
PF      0       20:34:37.420    Statistics      shortest pass 0:01:28.086, longest pass 0:01:31.043, average pass 0:01:30.043
CF      0       20:34:37.420    Statistics      8000 frames (3.14 Mb total, 412 bytes per frame) received
RE      0       20:34:37.421    Statistics      local 8 tasks (100%), remote 0 tasks (0%), cloud 0 tasks (0%)

8 agenti, 8 passaggi

EE      0       20:40:18.642    Core 1  pass 0 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:02:08.677
JJ      0       20:40:18.846    Core 8  pass 7 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:02:08.405
GP      0       20:40:19.243    Core 6  pass 5 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:02:08.930
DI      0       20:40:19.870    Core 2  pass 1 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:02:09.912
OO      0       20:40:20.049    Core 4  pass 3 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:02:10.090
MD      0       20:40:20.307    Core 3  pass 2 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:02:10.350
FM      0       20:40:21.323    Core 7  pass 6 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:02:10.983
PS      0       20:40:21.375    Core 5  pass 4 returned result 1001000.00 in 0:02:11.110
KG      0       20:40:21.375    Tester  optimization finished, total passes 8
NS      0       20:40:21.386    Statistics      optimization done in 2 minutes 12 seconds
NJ      0       20:40:21.386    Statistics      shortest pass 0:02:08.405, longest pass 0:02:11.110, average pass 0:02:09.807
RJ      0       20:40:21.386    Statistics      8000 frames (3.14 Mb total, 412 bytes per frame) received
DQ      0       20:40:21.386    Statistics      local 8 tasks (100%), remote 0 tasks (0%), cloud 0 tasks (0%)

Albero_Brut_TestPL_F

4 agenti 8 passaggi

EI      0       20:47:44.732    Core 1  pass 0 returned result 1000000.00 in 0:02:43.903
MN      0       20:47:46.827    Core 4  pass 6 returned result 1000000.00 in 0:02:45.985
DG      0       20:47:49.535    Core 2  pass 2 returned result 1000000.00 in 0:02:48.698
GM      0       20:47:52.933    Core 3  pass 4 returned result 1000000.00 in 0:02:52.631
LR      0       20:50:13.736    Core 1  pass 1 returned result 1000000.00 in 0:02:29.026
EH      0       20:50:19.324    Core 4  pass 7 returned result 1000000.00 in 0:02:32.515
PQ      0       20:50:25.653    Core 2  pass 3 returned result 1000000.00 in 0:02:36.136
CF      0       20:50:32.200    Core 3  pass 5 returned result 1000000.00 in 0:02:39.285
ES      0       20:50:32.200    Tester  optimization finished, total passes 8
OG      0       20:50:32.211    Statistics      optimization done in 5 minutes 36 seconds
NN      0       20:50:32.211    Statistics      shortest pass 0:02:29.026, longest pass 0:02:52.631, average pass 0:02:41.022
LO      0       20:50:32.211    Statistics      8000 frames (3.14 Mb total, 412 bytes per frame) received
JJ      0       20:50:32.211    Statistics      local 8 tasks (100%), remote 0 tasks (0%), cloud 0 tasks (0%)

8 agenti 8 passaggi

KG      0       20:56:41.505    Core 3  pass 2 returned result 1000000.00 in 0:03:42.298
JL      0       20:56:42.220    Core 2  pass 1 returned result 1000000.00 in 0:03:43.017
IE      0       20:56:42.573    Core 1  pass 0 returned result 1000000.00 in 0:03:43.367
DK      0       20:56:43.809    Core 4  pass 3 returned result 1000000.00 in 0:03:44.609
DP      0       20:56:44.715    Core 7  pass 6 returned result 1000000.00 in 0:03:44.424
GF      0       20:56:45.115    Core 5  pass 4 returned result 1000000.00 in 0:03:44.974
IO      0       20:56:45.763    Core 6  pass 5 returned result 1000000.00 in 0:03:45.587
KD      0       20:56:46.010    Core 8  pass 7 returned result 1000000.00 in 0:03:45.727
GE      0       20:56:46.010    Tester  optimization finished, total passes 8
IQ      0       20:56:46.020    Statistics      optimization done in 3 minutes 48 seconds
JH      0       20:56:46.020    Statistics      shortest pass 0:03:42.298, longest pass 0:03:45.727, average pass 0:03:44.250
OM      0       20:56:46.020    Statistics      8000 frames (3.14 Mb total, 412 bytes per frame) received
FL      0       20:56:46.021    Statistics      local 8 tasks (100%), remote 0 tasks (0%), cloud 0 tasks (0%)

4 e 8 agenti 27-32% di differenza di velocità. Penso che il problema sia nella cache della memoria, FX è noto per il suo collo di bottiglia della cache. Non posso overcloccarlo purtroppo per controllarlo, la mia pietra non ha assolutamente nessun overclock di memoria e northbridge.

 
ma se si confrontano le versioni f e f-fast, la differenza è colossale! ecco le meraviglie dell'ottimizzazione di 6,79 volte! O con quale versione si dovrebbe confrontare f-fast?
 
Georgiy Merts:

Quindi, ho ricompilato tutti e tre gli EA ancora una volta.

Le cifre sono scese un po' - le ha portate al tavolo per ora. Il computer abilita l'auto-boost durante l'ottimizzazione?

 
Maxim Romanov:

4 e 8 agenti hanno una differenza di velocità del 27-32 per cento. Penso che il problema sia nella cache della memoria, FX è famoso per il suo collo di bottiglia della cache. Non posso overcloccare purtroppo per controllarlo, la mia pietra non ha assolutamente nessun overclock di memoria e northbridge.

Lo attribuisco a 4 core FPU.

Maxim Romanov:
ma se si confrontano le versioni f e f-fast, la differenza è colossale! qui sono meraviglie di ottimizzazione 6.79! O con quale versione si dovrebbe confrontare f-fast?

Sono d'accordo, è fenomenale. Confrontate correttamente le versioni. È interessante notare che il divario dall'i7-8700 si è ridotto in termini percentuali per i processori più vecchi.

 

Dati attuali - nessun risultato di test in blu.

L'E5-2670 2pc è ora chiaramente in vantaggio sull'i7-8700, il che ha senso.

 
Aleksey Vyazmikin:

Le cifre sono scese leggermente - le ha prese in una tabella per ora. Il computer abilita il boosting automatico durante l'ottimizzazione?

Molto probabilmente sì. Ci sono molti parametri di regolazione fine nel BIOS, ma non li ho approfonditi, ho solo impostato il profilo Performance.

 
Georgiy Merts:

Molto probabilmente sì. Ci sono molti parametri di regolazione fine nel BIOS, ma non ci sono entrato, ho solo impostato il profilo Performance.

Poi, forse, quando l'hypertrading è spento, il booster si attiverà più velocemente o ad una frequenza più alta. Sarebbe bene fissare la frequenza dei test oggettivi.

 

Ho aggiunto i risultati del processore E5-2470 - 2 unità, anche se la memoria è DDR3-800, che probabilmente sottostima leggermente il potenziale, ma non credo che significativamente - 5% al 10%.

Ho deciso di guardare i prezzi dei componenti usati per valutare la fattibilità del montaggio - i prezzi sono presi da Avito e Aliexpress.

Il calcolo è stato fatto come segue: il costo del montaggio (colonna "Totale") è stato diviso per il numero di passaggi all'ora. Il filtraggio viene eseguito per la penultima colonna poiché l'Expert Advisor è il più pesante e non tutti, purtroppo, hanno dato i dati per l'ultimo EA.


Sembra che l'i7-8700 sia davvero una buona opzione per l'ottimizzazione, anche tenendo conto del prezzo di mercato dell'usato.

La memoria per i processori AMD su socket AM3 e AM3+ è stata presa come speciale, solo per AMD (la uso io stesso) - frequenza 1600.

Frequenza di memoria DDR4 2600 - frequenza superiore non è commensurabile con guadagno di prestazioni e, a giudicare dai test di altre fonti.

Per un po' di processori potenti può risparmiare sul refrigeratore - 500 rubli.

Alimentazione ha preso 500 watt - questo è davvero sufficiente, se non falso o già morto, ma se possibile meglio ottenere un nuovo, ma non top-end, ma il prezzo di bu è posato su un'opzione molto solida.

La scheda grafica in tutte le varianti è integrata nel processore o madre, tranne Ryzen, ma la spina in 250-300 rubli ha deciso di non prendere in considerazione come un'eccezione.

 

Sembra che l'argomento stia marcendo, lascerò cadere il file che ho usato per contare e disegnare le tabelle in excel.

File:
CPU_Test_FX.zip  25 kb
Motivazione: