|
1 año
experiencia
|
4
productos
|
2
versiones demo
|
|
0
trabajos
|
0
señales
|
0
suscriptores
|
PHSB Elliott EA Operaciones automatizadas basadas en la estructura de mercado de las ondas de Elliott Opera según la estructura. Deja que el sistema se encargue de la operación. El PHSB Elliott EA es un asesor experto de MetaTrader 5 diseñado para analizar automáticamente la estructura de los precios utilizando principios inspirados en la teoría de las ondas de Elliott e identificar posibles oportunidades de trading durante el desarrollo de movimientos impulsivos. En lugar de basarse en una
PHSB Market Vision Una nueva forma de ver el mercado. El mercado siempre está hablando. La cuestión es saber interpretar lo que el precio está mostrando. PHSB Market Vision fue desarrollado para proporcionar una visión más amplia y organizada del comportamiento del mercado, reuniendo en una sola herramienta diferentes referencias de precio, tendencia, volatilidad y volumen . En lugar de seguir varios indicadores por separado, Market Vision integra esta información en una estructura visual
PHSB Elliott Wave — Indicador de Ondas de Elliott para MT5 Identifica la estructura del mercado mediante las Ondas de Elliott PHSB Elliott Wave es un indicador desarrollado para MetaTrader 5 con el objetivo de ayudar a los traders a identificar y seguir las Ondas de Elliott directamente en el gráfico. La propuesta del indicador es transformar una teoría que muchas veces puede parecer subjetiva en una forma de análisis de la estructura del precio más objetiva, visual y organizada . En lugar de
Gold FVG Finder EA El Gold FVG Finder EA es un asesor experto selectivo para MetaTrader 5, diseñado para operar con oro en el par XAUUSD M15 . La estrategia se basa en las repetidas pruebas del Fair Value Gap, el filtrado del régimen ATR, la confirmación del barrido de liquidez, la estructura del mercado y una gestión controlada del riesgo. Este EA no es un sistema de rejilla y no utiliza la estrategia martingala. La idea principal no es abrir operaciones todos los días a cualquier precio. El EA
A London breakout can look clean on M15, while real results are changed by spread spikes, slow VPS, slippage, or wrong broker server time.
Before changing inputs, I check:
- Maximum spread at entry time.
- VPS latency to the broker server.
- Slippage during volatile minutes.
- Broker time and session window.
- Stop level and execution rules.
If two brokers show different results, the EA is not always the problem. Sometimes the environment is different.
What VPS or broker setup gives you the most stable XAUUSD execution?
MQL5 Cloud Network helps test thousands of combinations fast, but speed does not replace validation.
For every XAUUSD preset I want to see:
- In-sample logic that still makes sense.
- Out-of-sample behavior that does not collapse.
- Forward or demo results close to the test expectations.
- Stable neighbors, not one magic parameter cell.
A strong preset should be boring: reasonable trade count, controlled drawdown, no single perfect week, and similar behavior across nearby inputs.
How do you separate optimization from curve-fitting?
A profitable XAUUSD backtest is not enough if it can violate daily drawdown, max drawdown, or trade limits.
Before I run an EA on a challenge, I check:
- Daily DD limit and maximum drawdown.
- Risk per trade after a losing streak.
- Maximum trades per session and stop-trading rules.
- News and spread filters for volatile periods.
- Broker time and session alignment.
Small risk settings look boring, but they often keep the account alive long enough for the edge to work.
What is your strictest prop-firm rule?
In MetaTrader 5, ONNX models are useful as a confirmation layer, especially for regime detection, volatility context, or breakout quality scoring.
For a breakout robot, I prefer this order:
- Logic first: range, breakout, stop, and risk.
- Filter second: trend, volatility, and session context.
- AI last: confirmation, not a blind entry signal.
If the base idea loses before AI, the model can hide the weakness during optimization. A simple rule should survive out-of-sample before any machine learning is added.
What do you trust more: simple rules or AI filters?
For XAUUSD, a breakout setup can be technically correct and still be a bad trade if the first impulse is news-driven.
My basic news filter is simple:
- Avoid high-impact windows before and after the release.
- Wait for spread to normalize before new entries.
- Let London confirm a real breakout after the noise.
The goal is not to catch every move. The goal is to skip conditions where execution and volatility are out of control.
Do you disable gold robots around high-impact news?
On XAUUSD, a few extra points of spread at the wrong moment can turn a normal breakout entry into a bad one.
This is especially important around London open, when volatility grows fast and liquidity can change quickly.
I prefer simple filters that protect the entry before the trade is opened.
Session range, breakout level, spread filter, risk limit, one trade per day.
Not complicated, but clear.
This is why I like visual testing. You can quickly notice things that are easy to miss in a clean backtest report.
Wrong session time, wide range, bad spread, false breakout, entry too close to news.
A breakout EA should not only open trades. It should also know when market conditions are not good enough.
Simple logic is easier to control.
A lot of traders expect an EA to open positions every day. I do not think this is a healthy way to trade gold.
Some days the Asian range is too wide. Some days the spread is not good. Some days the breakout already happened before the trading window.
In these situations, skipping the day is better than forcing a weak entry.
For XAUUSD, discipline is often more important than frequency.
