|
1 년도
경험
|
4
제품
|
2
데모 버전
|
|
0
작업
|
0
거래 신호
|
0
구독자
|
PHSB Elliott EA Automated Trading Based on Elliott Wave Market Structure Trade the structure. Let the system manage the operation. The PHSB Elliott EA is a MetaTrader 5 Expert Advisor designed to automatically analyze price structure using principles inspired by Elliott Wave theory and identify potential trading opportunities during the development of impulsive movements. Instead of relying on a simple combination of traditional indicators, the EA works directly with price structure and swing
PHSB Market Vision 시장을 바라보는 새로운 방법. 시장은 항상 이야기하고 있습니다. 중요한 것은 가격이 보여주는 정보를 어떻게 해석하느냐입니다. PHSB Market Vision 은 시장의 움직임을 보다 폭넓고 체계적으로 파악할 수 있도록 개발된 도구입니다. 가격, 추세, 변동성, 거래량 에 대한 다양한 정보를 하나의 도구에 통합했습니다. 여러 지표를 각각 따로 확인하는 대신, Market Vision은 이러한 정보를 하나의 통합된 시각적 구조로 보여주어 시장을 동시에 다양한 관점에서 관찰할 수 있도록 합니다. 👁️ 가격 그 이상을 보십시오 가격만으로는 시장의 전체 이야기를 볼 수 없습니다. 가격이 움직이는 방식, 특정 기준과의 관계, 변동성의 확대 또는 축소, 그리고 거래량 대비 가격의 위치는 시장 분석에 중요한 정보를 제공할 수 있습니다. PHSB Market Vision 은 바로 이러한 정보를 차트 위에 체계적으로 정리하여 보다 쉽게 해석할 수 있도록
PHSB Elliott Wave — MT5용 엘리어트 파동 지표 엘리어트 파동을 통해 시장 구조를 분석하세요 PHSB Elliott Wave 는 MetaTrader 5를 위해 개발된 지표로, 차트에서 **엘리어트 파동(Elliott Wave)**의 구조를 식별하고 그 형성 과정을 추적할 수 있도록 설계되었습니다. 엘리어트 파동 이론은 때때로 상당히 주관적인 분석 방법으로 느껴질 수 있습니다. PHSB Elliott Wave는 이러한 이론을 보다 객관적이고 시각적이며 체계적인 가격 구조 분석 방법 으로 활용할 수 있도록 개발되었습니다. 단순히 개별적인 패턴을 찾는 것이 아니라, 시장의 피벗(Pivot) 형성을 추적하고 이러한 지점을 기반으로 가능한 엘리어트 파동 구조를 구성하고 검증합니다. 지표는 어떻게 작동하나요? 시장은 끊임없이 새로운 고점과 저점 을 형성합니다. PHSB Elliott Wave는 이러한 가격 움직임을 이용하여 시장의 주요 구조적 피벗 을 식별합니다. 그리고 이러한
Gold FVG Finder EA Gold FVG Finder EA is a selective Expert Advisor for MetaTrader 5, designed for trading gold on XAUUSD M15 . The strategy is built around Fair Value Gap retests, ATR regime filtering, liquidity sweep confirmation, market structure and controlled risk management. This EA is not a grid system and it does not use martingale. The main idea is not to open trades every day at any cost. The EA waits for a specific gold market structure where an FVG continuation setup
A London breakout can look clean on M15, while real results are changed by spread spikes, slow VPS, slippage, or wrong broker server time.
Before changing inputs, I check:
- Maximum spread at entry time.
- VPS latency to the broker server.
- Slippage during volatile minutes.
- Broker time and session window.
- Stop level and execution rules.
If two brokers show different results, the EA is not always the problem. Sometimes the environment is different.
What VPS or broker setup gives you the most stable XAUUSD execution?
MQL5 Cloud Network helps test thousands of combinations fast, but speed does not replace validation.
For every XAUUSD preset I want to see:
- In-sample logic that still makes sense.
- Out-of-sample behavior that does not collapse.
- Forward or demo results close to the test expectations.
- Stable neighbors, not one magic parameter cell.
A strong preset should be boring: reasonable trade count, controlled drawdown, no single perfect week, and similar behavior across nearby inputs.
How do you separate optimization from curve-fitting?
A profitable XAUUSD backtest is not enough if it can violate daily drawdown, max drawdown, or trade limits.
Before I run an EA on a challenge, I check:
- Daily DD limit and maximum drawdown.
- Risk per trade after a losing streak.
- Maximum trades per session and stop-trading rules.
- News and spread filters for volatile periods.
- Broker time and session alignment.
Small risk settings look boring, but they often keep the account alive long enough for the edge to work.
What is your strictest prop-firm rule?
In MetaTrader 5, ONNX models are useful as a confirmation layer, especially for regime detection, volatility context, or breakout quality scoring.
For a breakout robot, I prefer this order:
- Logic first: range, breakout, stop, and risk.
- Filter second: trend, volatility, and session context.
- AI last: confirmation, not a blind entry signal.
If the base idea loses before AI, the model can hide the weakness during optimization. A simple rule should survive out-of-sample before any machine learning is added.
What do you trust more: simple rules or AI filters?
For XAUUSD, a breakout setup can be technically correct and still be a bad trade if the first impulse is news-driven.
My basic news filter is simple:
- Avoid high-impact windows before and after the release.
- Wait for spread to normalize before new entries.
- Let London confirm a real breakout after the noise.
The goal is not to catch every move. The goal is to skip conditions where execution and volatility are out of control.
Do you disable gold robots around high-impact news?
On XAUUSD, a few extra points of spread at the wrong moment can turn a normal breakout entry into a bad one.
This is especially important around London open, when volatility grows fast and liquidity can change quickly.
I prefer simple filters that protect the entry before the trade is opened.
Session range, breakout level, spread filter, risk limit, one trade per day.
Not complicated, but clear.
This is why I like visual testing. You can quickly notice things that are easy to miss in a clean backtest report.
Wrong session time, wide range, bad spread, false breakout, entry too close to news.
A breakout EA should not only open trades. It should also know when market conditions are not good enough.
Simple logic is easier to control.
A lot of traders expect an EA to open positions every day. I do not think this is a healthy way to trade gold.
Some days the Asian range is too wide. Some days the spread is not good. Some days the breakout already happened before the trading window.
In these situations, skipping the day is better than forcing a weak entry.
For XAUUSD, discipline is often more important than frequency.
