Discussion of article "The checks a trading robot must pass before publication in the Market" - page 28

New comment
 
Stanislav Korotky #:

With the current dominance of AI and IO, when a model is stitched into an EA, the presence of hidden parameters (in the number of thousands or millions!) is everywhere. And it is impossible to check such a thing. In principle, most EAs have some variables that for one reason or another are not placed in the interface (for debugging, experimental modes, etc.) and can be controlled in alternative ways. I don't see any violations in this.

Let's imagine that TC sets fixed SL/TP. Is it a violation to hide the possibility of adjusting these parameters or optimising them? 
sinput int inSL = 100; // SL
sinput int inTP = 100; // TP
 
fxsaber #:
Let's imagine that a TC sets fixed SL/TP. Is it a violation to hide the possibility of adjusting these parameters or optimising them?
It is hardly an infringement. IMHO, the author himself decides what and how to optimise.
 
Stanislav Korotky #:
This is hardly a violation. IMHO, the author himself decides what and how to optimise.
A trading advisor without input parameters is apparently a valid option.
1...2122232425262728
New comment