Discussion of article "The checks a trading robot must pass before publication in the Market" - page 28
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
With the current dominance of AI and IO, when a model is stitched into an EA, the presence of hidden parameters (in the number of thousands or millions!) is everywhere. And it is impossible to check such a thing. In principle, most EAs have some variables that for one reason or another are not placed in the interface (for debugging, experimental modes, etc.) and can be controlled in alternative ways. I don't see any violations in this.
Let's imagine that a TC sets fixed SL/TP. Is it a violation to hide the possibility of adjusting these parameters or optimising them?
This is hardly a violation. IMHO, the author himself decides what and how to optimise.
Hi everyone, I developed an Expert Advisor (EA) exclusively for XAUUSD on M5, but when I run the validation or attempt to publish it, the test seems to be automatically running on EURUSD, which causes a validation failure.
I want to ensure the EA validates correctly for XAUUSD only.
Any guidance on how to fix this issue so I can successfully publish my EA would be appreciated!
"test on EURUSD,H1 (netting)
DQ 0 01:40:07.098 Core 01 2022.02.01 00:00:00 WARNING: EA designed for M5. Running on PERIOD_H1 — FVG signals may not fire correctly.
2022.03.10 16:39:40 failed modify #18 sell 1.8 EURUSD sl: 1.10253, tp: 1.09984 -> sl: 1.10200, tp: 1.09984 [Modification failed due to order or position being close to market]
strategy tester report 12 total trades"