Indicators: SVS_Trend

New comment
 

SVS_Trend:

Trend Indicator. There are 10 possible variants of changing the averaging of the signal line in this indicator:

  1. SMA - simple moving average;
  2. EMA - exponential moving average;
  3. SMMA - smoothed moving average;
  4. LWMA - linear weighted moving average;
  5. JJMA - JMA adaptive average;
  6. JurX - ultralinear smoothing;
  7. ParMA - parabolic smoothing;
  8. T3 - Tillson's multiple exponential smoothing;
  9. VIDYA - smoothing with the use of the Tushar Chande's algorithm; 
  10. AMA - smoothing with the use of the Perry Kaufman's algorithm.

Author: Nikolay Kositsin

Fig.1 The SVS_Trend indicator

 

К величайшему сожалению, сам автор не оставил никаких комментариев к своему гениальному творению, и поэтому полный и исчерпывающий смысл сигналов, которые оно генерирует остается неясным.

Nikolay, what motivated you to rewrite this indicator?

Do you use it? Did someone ask you to? Do you just rewrite everything?

 
komposter:

Nikolay, what motivated you to rewrite this indicator?

Do you use it? Did someone ask you to? Do you just rewrite everything?

A counter question: why do you personally dislike it so much that you ask such, not quite, to put it mildly, tactful questions? I personally found him interesting enough, that's all. Well, why not sometimes do things that are just interesting enough. And if you are so concerned about the lack of comments to this, in my opinion, masterpiece, where were you when you were filling the MQL4 codebase? There is probably half of such goodness there. Moreover, the quality of the code was not even close to mine!

 
komposter:

Nikolay, what motivated you to rewrite this indicator?

I think nothing but money can motivate me to port code of dubious usefulness in such volumes.
 
TheXpert:
I guess nothing but money can motivate you more to port code of dubious utility in such volumes.

А! It's all the same faces! Another rehearsed scenario! We can only be glad that the times of comrades LYSENKO have passed for a long time, and they can do nothing but toothless and irrelevant comments!

 
GODZILLA:
We can only be glad that the times of comrades LYSENKO have passed for a very long time, and they can't make anything but toothless and irrelevant comments!
) what the hell do I need you for. I just expressed my opinion, not only mine, by the way, apparently.
 
TheXpert:
I think nothing but money can motivate you to port code of dubious usefulness in such volumes.
A person writes quality code. Well, thank goodness. Someone will find it useful. Let's just say thank you.
 
TheXpert:
) I don't give a shit about you. I just expressed my opinion, not only mine, by the way, apparently.
The opinion of a person about programming who spends all day sitting on forums is not worth posting it on a programming site! How can such a person have enough qualification of a programmer to understand this and make any sane judgements about it?
 
GODZILLA:
It's personal. That means it's catching on :) . That's a slam dunk.
 
GODZILLA:

A counter question: what do you personally dislike about him that you ask such, to put it mildly, tactful questions? I personally found him interesting enough, that's all. Well, why not sometimes do things that are just interesting enough. And if you are so concerned about the lack of comments to this, in my opinion, masterpiece, where were you when you were filling the MQL4 codebase? There is probably half of such goodness there. Moreover, the quality of the code was not even close to mine!

I did not mean to offend you. Your efforts in porting codes are undoubtedly worth encouraging. I just really don't understand why you should rewrite such rubbish.

The mql4 database was the first centralised and public one, so the question "why rewrite it?" could not sound there.

And if I were a moderator there, believe me, there would be much less shit (oh, sorry, useless, in my opinion, codes) in it.


Again, sorry if I hit a nerve. You shouldn't have flared up...

 
TheXpert:
I think nothing but money can motivate you to move code of dubious usefulness in such volumes.

Money - indirectly, through rating-popularity-orders?

As far as I understand, MQ doesn't pay for codes, so there is no direct benefit.

And the price of the rating earned in this way, in my opinion, is not very high...

12
New comment