Ready to ask the first question.
The very first formula in the article is justified in this way:
Предположим далее, что в течении бесконечно малого отрезка времени dt воздействующая сила уменьшится на величину dD(t) пропорционально оставшейся к моменту времени t силе D(t):
With this formulation, there must necessarily be a minus (force decreases) in front of the right-hand side of the equation. And there isn't...
Although this is rather a typo - the equation is solved as if the minus were there.
I'm ready to ask the first question.
The very first formula in the article is justified as follows:
With this formulation, there must necessarily be a minus (force decreases) in front of the right-hand side of the equation. And there isn't...
Although this is rather a typo - the equation is solved as if the minus were there.
Ready to ask the first question.
ready to ask the second question ;)
why didn't you add Excel calculations to the article ? secret intention, or did you forget ?
I would like to check the results, but alas, I don't remember the maths anymore, and I'm afraid to make a mistake when writing the code, I've long since passed higher maths and forgotten it for uselessness, it's easier for me now to knock on my laptop or mount/service controllers.
Model upon model. Is there anything of the reality that people live in? Real statistics that confirm the properties of the model?
ready to ask the second question ;)
why didn't you add Excel calculations to the article ? secret intention, or did you forget ?
I would like to check the results, but alas, I don't remember the maths anymore, and I'm afraid to make a mistake when composing the code, I've long passed higher maths and forgotten it for uselessness, it's easier for me now to tap on my laptop or mount/service controllers.
Now the regression equation (10b), for predicting the market price P(t), takes the following final form:
Where P(0)corr and Dcorr contain information about the sum of the actual price values and the trend direction of the actual data for t = 0,1,2,......k;
Does your formula assume forecasting for t > k?
I assume you have not in any way compared your regression prediction with the linear regression prediction for t > k?
Can you please post an excel that already has all the equations you are describing?
estimated and forecast (P1) - (red line)
Where P(0)corr and Dcorr contain information about the sum of the actual price values and the trend direction of the actual data for t = 0,1,2,......k;
Does your formula assume forecasting for t > k?
I assume you have not in any way compared your regression prediction with the linear regression prediction for t > k?

- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
You agree to website policy and terms of use
New article Universal Regression Model for Market Price Prediction is published:
Author: Юсуфходжа