MetaTrader 5 Platform build 4585; lost boolean debug features still not fixed! - page 2
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It's amazing you were selected as a moderator with that unprofessional, aggressive tone towards users. If you don't like what I said, perhaps try to debunk it in a polite and professional manner, which you can't because there's no defense or excuses for this.
Do you even realize that this is a thread of people complaining about bugs that have been reported with not so much as a response (let alone a FIX) from MetaQuotes?
As far as "my needs," it's a bug with an MQL4 function that affects everyone who uses it. It's been a been a bug for several years, btw, so it should've been fixed then, no excuses.
And as far as MT4 goes, it still gets occasional updates here and there. I know this because I've been forced to update it quite a bit in the past few years. Also, brokers and traders are still using it, so you should at least fix the issues that remain. No one's asking for new features, just bug fixes. Apparently, that's too much to ask for...
There is absolutely nothing unprofessional or impolite in my answer. Let's debunk it as you suggested :
That's absolutely not right.
While I agree it's still perfectible, they care about the developers community in general, inside their own agenda and priorities.
So I agree it's perfectible, isn't that suitable for you ? As explained above, they care, but of course they have their agenda and priorities, MetaQuotes is a business company, and we are not even their customers (except when using the paid services of this site), brokers are. Why should a business company listen to people which are not even their customers ? Still they do it, not perfectly for sure. That's some other facts.
What they probably don't care is about you and your needs, you have no right to talk in name of the community of MQL developers.
MQ don't care about any individual here, it's not about you or me. I suppose you took this remark personally ? If yes, you should not, it's just an other fact.
For sure, you wrote as if you were talking in the name of the community " They just don't care about their developer community". As a member of this community, a little more implied than you, I don't want you or anyone else to talk in my name without my agreement. Isn't that obvious ?
Additionally, MT4 is done, they announced there will be no development or bug fixes years ago. Only critical bugs and security issues.
As already stated by others in the meantime, MT4 development and "standard" bug fix is DONE, since a long time.
Only critical bugs and security issues. These are the updates you saw in the last years. Why are you expecting a special treatment that all others don't get ?
I am a volunteer moderator, not paid, not affiliated to MetaQuotes. I have a lot of experience with MQL, MT4 and MT5, I am always polite and almost always professional, but I don't hesitate to say the truth to people like you, which of course don't like it. For sure I don't like childish behaviour (give me what I want or I will be angry) and I am regularly sarcastic.
Welcome to mql5.com, and thank you for your great contribution in the community.
And the more than difficult returns of the ibarshift function, can we talk about it?
iBarShift - Timeseries and Indicators Access - MQL5 Reference - Reference on algorithmic/automated trading language for MetaTrader 5
Regularly and still today I had to bypass it because the results it gave me were not good.
-1 or 0
What do you think the function will be improved?
Good morning
And the more than difficult returns of the ibarshift function, can we talk about it?
iBarShift - Timeseries and Indicators Access - MQL5 Reference - Reference on algorithmic/automated trading language for MetaTrader 5
Regularly and still today I had to bypass it because the results it gave me were not good.
-1 or 0
What do you think the function will be improved?
This function works perfectly (as it's intended to work).
Please don't start an off-topic discussion here, this topic is about current build 4585.
Still use june buld 5.0 4410 to debug normally ... why it is niot fixed yet ???? all version after ... you can't debug code and check conditions ...
Developers made BIG BUG and not wanna to fix it ... playing with stupid AI function which doesn't work ever!
UPSET !
Yes, this error has existed for a long time. They have tried to fix it several times, but it has never been completely resolved, and I don't know the reason.
As users, I recommend always using version 4424 of Metaeditor64.exe, as this version has no issues and compiles faster than versions above 4424.
You can find version 4424 in a certain channel on Telegram.