Discussing the article: "Gain An Edge Over Any Market (Part II): Forecasting Technical Indicators" - page 4

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Another interpretation, in terms of causal inference. If the change in the indicator is the reason for the change in the exchange rate, it is leading. If the change in the exchange rate causes the change in the indicator, it is lagging. Therefore, all technical indicators based on prices are lagging.
You can't beat the market! It's invincible!
for the hand-wringers and especially those who believe in their inner voice.
"The advance or lag is defined in relation to the original series. If an indicator can forecast prices, it is leading. If it cannot, it is lagging :)"
This is a well-established terminology, which I don't know where it came from :) I agree that we can do without it. What we have is what we have. There are leading indicators in macroeconomics, maybe from there. Or from the DSP. By analogy, everything that is not leading is lagging.
Like the relationship between stock indexes and corporate tax receipts collected by the Government.
You can't beat the market! It's invincible!
For example, the relationship between stock indices and corporate tax revenues collected by the government.
Yeah, something like that :)
Yeah, something like that :)
Maximka, have you discovered new markets for yourself, there are smiles in every post