You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
like a person is not a physical object and doesn't create any information.
fields create information just like that. And fields with matter create information.
information doesn't create anything, including matter. It just reflects the structure of data. It's an abstraction.
Man is a physical object like everything else. He interacts exclusively with matter and nothing else. Reads information from a material medium, processes it.
The question is what "creates information" means. He writes a Harry Potter book, he creates it. But, given the infinite existence of the universe, and its infinite extent in all directions, there have already existed also an infinite number of times all sorts of civilisations, and there are, which have already created Harry Potter. Well, maybe the surname had one "t". Anyway, that's the philosophical aspect of it. I mean, a man kneads clay, moving matter, but he can't touch information. He cognises it.
So the notion of "creating information" is something out of context already.
Man is a physical object like everything else. He interacts exclusively with matter and nothing else. Reads information from a material medium, processes it.
The question is what "creates information" means. He writes a Harry Potter book, he creates it. But, given the infinite existence of the universe, and its infinite extent in all directions, there have already existed also an infinite number of times all sorts of civilisations, and there are, which have already created Harry Potter. Well, maybe the surname had one "t". Anyway, that's the philosophical aspect of it. I mean, a man kneads clay, moving matter, but he can't touch information. He cognises it.
So the notion of "creating information" is something out of context already.
It's a sad story. It's a three-way street.
To describe the structure of an atom does not mean to determine how exactly it should be constructed. There are laws of existence of Matter and man can only cognise them on the basis of data analysis.
At the same time man does not create new Information, but only cognises existing Information.
In this case, a person does not create new Information, but only cognises existing Information.
Write something useful.
Shall I list the shit you've written in your last 10 posts?
There's nothing but brackets and remarks, you're just a blabbermouth.
It's a sad story. We're confused about three different things.
What's the difference?
Ale, this is for your information ....
Information as a reduction of uncertainty....
Because the 3 pines are not clear to everyone)))))))
What's the difference?
Ale, this is for your information ....
Information as a reduction of uncertainty....
Otherwise 3 pine trees are incomprehensible to everyone)))))
Wha? difference between what and what?
are you all trying to integrate the concept of information into your worldview? You can't just integrate it, you have to study philosophy at your leisure.
Starting with the simplest definitions, then complicate it to the modern understanding and connect it with other philosophical categories like Matter, Being, Quantity, Form, etc.
In the end, you'll end up with the duality of the mind, of course, but still. When you come to this point, a kind of nirvana comes.
is if you want enlightenment. If not, then define it as you wish :)What? The difference between what and what?
are you all trying to integrate the concept of information into your worldview? You can't just integrate it, you have to study philosophy at your leisure.
Starting with the simplest definitions, then complicate it to the modern understanding and connect it with other philosophical categories like Matter, Being, Quantity, Form, etc.
In the end, you'll end up with the duality of the mind, of course, but nevertheless. When you come to this point, a kind of nirvana comes.
is if you want enlightenment. If not, then define it as you wish.)Well through duality of mind and the world to understand the difference of context of the word info in different phrases is cool)))).
And so, yes, one should read, and even philosophers)))))
Well through the duality of mind and world to understand the different context of the word infa in different phrases is cool))))
And so, yes, it is necessary to read, and even philosophers))))))