EA for passing prop firms and funded trading?

New comment
[Deleted]  

Hi guys,

I was interested if anyone have some EA that is working stable on prop firms like FTMO and similar. All of them I was trying, free and paid were not good at all. I also tried freelance with job offer, here I was not successful as well with anything stable and performing for long term. Thanks!

 
I don't think you'll find someone that will give you their working EA. For create a job offer you need to specific about what strategy that you want to use and it won't work if you say 'make me a strategy that works in prop trading' or something like that.
 
Ceelser:

Hi guys,

I was interested if anyone have some EA that is working stable on prop firms like FTMO and similar. All of them I was trying, free and paid were not good at all. I also tried freelance with job offer, here I was not successful as well with anything stable and performing for long term. Thanks!

if it was as easy as that, i think everyone would have already done that.

 
Such recommendations are not allowed in this forum, you should make your own search in the Market and Codebase or post your requirements as a job in the Freelance section.
 
https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/456749
You may find this thread useful.
 
A good EA do not give you more than 10 to 30 Percent yearly as per maket sideway or trend, so every body want 100 percent ,200 percent return in one year so EA are going to wrong meaning. it controls your greed and sentiment, but takes few time to pass prop firm.
 
The stability issue you're describing is almost always an overfitting problem rather than a prop firm specific issue. an EA that can't perform consistently on a personal account won't suddenly become consistent on a funded one. Fix the strategy or you'll keep hitting the same wall regardless of where you run it. 
 
One option is to have an alternative trading strategy that allows you to visually and manually improve the bot's efficiency, if that option is available, of course; so that when you're looking at the chart, you can see what your bot doesn't. For example, high-potential entries or exits.
 
Medina Cortez Edison Armando #:
One option is to have an alternative trading strategy that allows you to visually and manually improve the bot's efficiency, if that option is available, of course; so that when you're looking at the chart, you can see what your bot doesn't. For example, high-potential entries or exits.

Can you clarify what you mean, please?

If you have a strategy that is better than your bot's strategy, then it seems that you can just code it into the bot. I mean... it's your logic in the bot that you coded anyway. The bot didn't code itself.

If you simply want to visually follow what your bot is doing, there is ChartIndicatorAdd() for example.

New comment