Discussion of article "The price movement model and its main provisions (Part 2): Probabilistic price field evolution equation and the occurrence of the observed random walk" - page 16

 
Maxim Kuznetsov #:

in every joke.

trying to explain "what it is" you will willy-nilly catch yourself thinking that you are partly explaining about wavelets. You can compare the video attached by Fedoseev with popular explanations of wavelets.

It exceeds my modest abilities...
I will watch the video again and be impressed)

 
Aleksey Nikolayev #:

If for repairing a moped, then nothing, and if for trying to build a theory combining the theory of relativity with quantum mechanics, then also nothing, but in a different sense)

In general, stratification is one of the basic concepts of topology, generalising another - Cartesian product.

If topology experts understood it, they could explain it, not like in that video. The whole of science is 70% in a state of schizophrenia. There is such nonsense everywhere, and when you figure it out, it turns out to be "stretching a rubber band" style fluff.

And the question remains - united the theory of relativity with quantum mechanics - so what? Generalised Cartesian works, so what?
 
Aleksey Nikolayev #:

More generally, stratification is one of the basic concepts of topology, generalising another, the Cartesian product.

Sounds beautiful)
Can it be somehow adapted to the market ?

 
Mikhail Tkachev #:

Sounds beautiful)
Can this be adapted to the market in any way ?

That's the wrong question. The right question is, can it be adapted to anything?

 
Dmitry Fedoseev #:

That's the wrong question. The right question is, can it even be adapted to anything?

Dimitri, beauty in itself has value)
Aesthetic...
Even if of no practical use)

 
Mikhail Tkachev #:

Dimitri, beauty has value in itself)
Aesthetic...
Even if no practical use)

Yes. You can hang it on the wall.

 
I need to connect my Merkabah to a spatial torus immediately
 

Probably the most demanded and grateful speciality is geology. At least I have never seen anyone attracted to trading by the movement of lithospheric plates :-) Apparently, geologists are quite self-fulfilling at their main place of work

 

I don't know what to say. There is such engineering geology. The topic of the lab: "to learn in practice the basics of selecting design ground elements in the schematisation of the ground object to build a computational geomechanical model".

There is a topic there, you can try to screw - "Larin's theory of hydride core".

 
Dmitry Fedoseev #:

If topology experts understood it, they could explain it, not like in that video. The whole science is 70% in a state of schizophrenia. Everywhere is such a nonsense, and when you figure it out, it turns out to be a fluff in the style of "stretching a rubber band".

And the question remains - united the theory of relativity with quantum mechanics - so what? Generalised Cartesian works, so what?

Cynicism is a form of naivety. If Maxwell (or anyone else) had not derived his unnecessary and incomprehensible formulas a hundred and fifty years ago, you would not have the opportunity to share your thoughts on the forum now. Not that that's such a bad thing, though)