A win-win forex trading system. First test round. - page 19

New comment
 
Account_:
One quick answer might be this:

You can trade a breakout of your positive loc (range) in two directions. Thereby increasing the profit of the aggregate position, while not losing the profit already locked in.

If the price settled in a range, as for example on the pound, for several weeks, you should trade inside this channel.

It is clear to trade in the channel.

What is not clear is the reason for losing the profit.

 
Vitaly Muzichenko:

Trading in a channel is clear.

Not clear: Why break a profit.

This is the profit that you have anyway. You do not need to fix it right away. I have given the rationale for the idea why not, in the posts above.

This is one implementation of Equity from above and using it to maximise profit from a position.
 
Vitaly Muzichenko:

Trading in a channel is clear.

I do not understand: Why should I catch a profit?

You need a super-planned profit to cover unexpected losses, so that the balance line would be flat and move beautifully... because "1200 subscribers" means that risky trading is not a risky business.

 
Account_:
One of the quick answers could be this:

You can trade a breakout of your positive loc (range) in two directions. Thereby increasing the profit of the aggregate position, while not losing the profit already locked in.

If the price has settled in a range, as for example on the pound, for several weeks, you should trade inside this channel.

But it won't make the difference, if we trade this same breakout with a fixed profit from previous trades.

Or if we draw within a range to return - also the difference will not bewith a fixed profit from previous trad es.

For example, balance=100, lock=50, current profit=10, amount=160,

the same without the lock: balance=150,current profit=10, amount=160,

what is the point of using the lock?

 
transcendreamer:

But there will be no difference, if we trade the same breakdown with fixed profit from previous trades.

Or, if you build a range on a return, there will also be no differencewith a fixed profit from previous trades.

For example, balance=100, lock=50, current profit=10, amount=160,

the same without the lock: balance=150,current profit=10, amount=160,

what is the point of using the lock?

If $50 is gained in a positive loc, then current profit is $50. Minus swaps for holding that lock. Such a lock dissolves over time, which means that the position must be managed so as not to overpay the swap above $50.

This profit of 50 is a risk.
 
Maxim Kuznetsov:

The super-planned profits are taken to cover unexpected losses and the balance line will be smooth and move beautifully... because "1200 subscribers" interrupt risky trading in a risk-free business...

It is unlikely - because subscribers are already counting on future profits - and disappointment is unavoidable, and if crisis happens, the reserve is no good there, it depends on the aggressiveness of course ...

 
transcendreamer:

It is unlikely - because subscribers are already counting on future profits - and disappointment cannot be avoided, and if a crisis happens, the reserve will not help, of course it depends on the aggressiveness...

It doesn't depend on it, but on the fact that the provider manages the risk of his account, and the subscriber just deposits funds and that's it.

Probably, the manager tells the subscribers to make some actions on the account. But not everyone follows them.
That's why it's better to understand the sum you're managing. And not to think for those who have 100 instead of 2000.

It's better to talk about the risks beforehand, when to withdraw. And not to wait for a loss.
 
Account_:
If $50 is gained into a positive lock, then the current profit is $50. Minus swaps for holding that lock. Such a lock dissolves over time, which means that the position needs to be managed so as not to overpay the swap above $50.

I misspelled a bit, implying that this is the current profit from positions outside the loc,

there is no difference between 60 and 50+10,

there is no difference between 100+50+10 and 150+10

 
Account_:
It doesn't depend on that, it depends on the fact that the provider manages the risk of his account, while the subscriber just deposits funds and that's it.

Perhaps the manager tells subscribers to do something about the account. But not everyone follows them.
So it's better to understand how much money you have to manage. Not to think for those who have 100 instead of the necessary 2000.

It's better to talk about the risks beforehand, when to withdraw. And not to wait for a loss.

Well, all this is also invariant with and without lock.

 
transcendreamer:
One more time: you can trade inside a lock. Inside a lock. Without closing the position.

By locking in a profit, you won't have equity on top. You'll have plus on balance and profit and that's it.

If there is a profit outside the lock, even better. You can slam the lock at any price, exactly at the current profit, which will be at the time of closing the lock.

Also, at a breakdown, you can lock in another profit. And increase equity at the top, trading two ranges... so you can cover the entire price spread (roughly speaking).

1...121314151617181920212223242526...29
New comment
Reason: