The future of the Forex industry - page 43
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
And a sense of superiority over other nations is not patriotism, it is fascism.
It is Nazism, and fascism is something else.
Eh, nice picture :)
I'll tell you more: when you go to a shop and buy some product, you are manipulating the shop staff, the marketing and logistics departments, the manufacturer of that product and its suppliers.
Well yes, manipulation lives on in the human world, but patriotism is the most massive one with fatal consequences.
This is Nazism and fascism is something else.
It's one step from Nazism to fascism).
Well then, descriptive functions, although these are properties. Quite often the wrong terms come up.
In the USSR, it was a mistake to abandon the Austrian economic school and switch to planned management with social competition and no real accountability for the results.
Until the introduction of the term Wolf Market in 2011, this term meant a market with wolfish laws. ) And you probably meant not more evil, but more ruthless.)
You could suggest the term Sparta's market, there too they didn't spare those who were useless)
Well yes, properties, attributes, all that... but in economics it's common to say "market functions", "money functions" etc.
"without real responsibility for the result." --- the main factor of decay
Do wolf laws mean - by lawlessness? - Or what?
Killing the worst is certainly overkill, and Kant's categorical imperative does not allow that, but then Sparta must have decided that a radically utilitarian approach is better for them.
Yeah, you don't even have to reach a consensus on music styles either 😀 I like all kinds of music except hard rock and rap.
I like all styles except excessively hard rock and rap. Only like it when the work is really talented and well executed. Sadly, there aren't many really talented pieces of music, it's mostly tricks.
I disagree.
Let's try another round. I'll write the arguments, then you, so that you have the last word, and we're done :) After all, the problem here may be a different interpretation of the concept.
For myself, I understand patriotism in the following way: it is a deep feeling inside every human being by which he draws a dividing line between his own circle and the strangers. This division can be based on any criteria: nation, race, gender, belonging to a football club, criminals and well-meaning people, etc. It depends on the individual. But, the most important idea is that all these differences do not give any reason to be proud of belonging to any of these groups. Because it doesn't make sense. However, people are proud. And that's where we've been waiting.
"You don't need a knife on a proud man, you give him a little sing-along and you can do what you like with him."
Let's try one more round. I'll write the arguments, then you, so that you have the last word, and we're done :) After all, the problem here may be different interpretations of the concept.
For myself, I understand patriotism in the following way: it is a deep feeling inside every human being by which he draws a dividing line between his own circle and the strangers. This division can be based on any criteria: nation, race, gender, belonging to a football club, criminals and well-meaning people, etc. It depends on the individual. But, the most important idea is that all these differences don't make you proud to belong to any of these groups. Because it doesn't make sense. However, people are proud. And that's where we've been waiting.
"You don't need a knife on a proud man, you sing a little to him and you do what you want with him."
Personally, I don't agree when patriotism is associated with pride in one's country. Sometimes there is nothing to be proud of, not everyone's country has achieved some extraordinary successes. But that doesn't stop you from loving your country, its nature, the people you communicate with, the culture of your country, the folk songs and songs created by modern composers, and much more.
the robot's already started working on its own.
and how does he relate to trans, that's the first thing they use in the nickname
Here's where I agree. Yes, if it is love, without dislike for others, then yes. But it is in dislike that people very much sin.
What a new word that is. The obedience of children to each other is already evident in the younger group. Is that an acquired skill as well? Besides, intelligence comes in many forms. And when a not very smart C student heads a company and a smart accountant works there, it is usually a consequence of innate qualities, not acquired Social, mental are different types of intelligence.
First the subordination goes on the principle of who is stronger, and then intelligence becomes more and more important.
Intellect is not an inborn quality, you are born as a computer without an operating system, and gradually the software is downloaded to you, or rather, it is written there in the process, and if there is no suitable environment, there will be no intellect.
We don't have to meet each other's expectations in details. We have different views on many details, and not only small ones)
Well, your views are very medieval! - Thomas Aquinas wrote about man as a tabula rasa!
You can also say that the work of the cell is not rational. There was no talk of human intellect and psychosomatics. Nature is rational from the very beginning.
Then atoms, molecules and even quarks are rational too, for cells are composed of them in the end, right?
Terrifying confusion of levels and blatant illiteracy and gross reductionism!
Now quickly and decisively go and read up on emergentism and on systems theory in general.
His cells are rational 🤣
And finally read what intelligence is, the content of the concept.
The only thing we can with a stretch accept from your passage is potential theoretical panpsychism in a suitable environment (in favour of future cyberpunk) but with appropriate refinement from integrated information theory, etc.
And my assertion is that rationality is innate and then intelligence, skills and their application is acquired.
And how is rationality different from intelligence?
Mowgli's behaviour would be the same as that of a wolf raised by sheep, in terms of being different from members of their populations. Not a valid example. The only thing is that yes, the man will not learn how to speak in this situation, but he will gain the skills of the community which brought him up. But the animals will not be able to rise to the level of human intellect. But so it is clear).
That's the point, the real Mowgli is a squalid creature and never human, which completely breaks down your argument in case you hadn't noticed. 😆
His intelligence would be at the grab-and-go level.
Ehhh... How wrong your theses are...... At least build a simple logic chain.))) Like animals don't behave rationally most of the time, but higher beings with brains are much more rational))))
А... well that's called running out of arguments - I'll just say "you're wrong" 😁🤣😃
Typical ad hominem - that's what young ladies do when they can't argue anything of substance - then they say the catchphrase - OY FATHER.
How can we debate with you if you haven't even bothered to look up the content of "intelligence"?