You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
You're like a burdock, clinging to everyone. Burdock is a weed, you're a weed here on the forum too. If I were the moderators, I'd pull you out by the roots and send you to the bathhouse for a month. Give you a break.
Oh, come on... Whatever, let him frolic... He's a local buffoon...
Some programmers have written about 1000 Expert Advisors, tested them,
and they haven't yet encountered a single gracious Expert Advisor.
They haven't gone into trading and continue working as freelancers.
Does it mean that there is not even 1 good, highly profitable EA per 1000 EAs?
more than 20,000 advisors and indicators have been written, there is a reasonable trading system, but miracles don't happen.
High profits always equal high risks. In any case.
And sometimes it happens that high risks increase the safety of trading under certain conditions.
It's like writing an autopilot for a car. You can write as many elementary autopilots as you like, but none of them will be able to drive a car properly. This task has a certain threshold of complexity, and nothing will work until you reach it.
I agree, it's not easy, there's too much to consider and it can still be something that's not accounted for, there's work to be done)
Some programmers have written 1000 EAs, tested them,
and they haven't met a single gracious EA yet.
They did not go into trading, and continue working as freelancers.
Does it mean that there is not even 1 good, highly profitable EA per 1000 EAs?
I doubt it. Autopilot operates under stationary conditions. But the market is fundamentally non-stationary.
Therefore, I argue that both a complex and a simple Expert Advisor will profit and lose with equal probability. If so, it is better to have a dozen simple ones than one ten times as complex.
My way so far - to have a few (a bit more complex than the most primitive ones), which, even though they may lose two futures in a row and lose more than half of GO, but over an interval of several years show a stable profitability. And when they are traded by a couple of dozens (diversification!), at any given moment someone may lose money, someone earns, but on the whole - work in the black.
more than 20,000 advisors and indicatorshave been written, there is a reasonable trading system, but miracles don't happen.
High profits always equal high risks. In any case.
And sometimes it happens that high risks increase the safety of trading under certain conditions.
Seriously, 20,000 (twenty thousand)?
My way so far is to have a few (a bit more complicated than the most primitive ones), which may lose two futures in a row and lose more than half of the CS, but show stable profitability over an interval of several years. And when they are traded by a couple dozen (diversification!), at any given moment, someone may lose money, someone earns, but in general - the work is positive.
My experience tells me that this is not possible.
I'm sure that:
My experience tells me that this is not possible.
I am sure that:
You've said it 100 times already. Give me an example.
Examples are a branch full of them.
The most striking one is the breakdown of the channel with fixed TP-SL on the pound dollar in 2018-2019, the TS was working fine. And then - bang... And that was it... Deflated and hasn't even been in the top 20 since.