Practical advice, please. - page 4
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Once you have selected a coefficient based on empirical data so that it corresponds to your ideas, and then you can automate the selection for other data.
If there are no other data in the future and you only need to make the right choice once, then additional criteria must be added, or purely "to your taste".
There is no such theorem or formula in mathematics.
In mathematics... And in statistics?
I thought it would help somehow:
Except I don't know how to apply them properly...
By the way, according to these functions, the first line has the lowest values, although its average error is the biggest...
It's the percentage of something that counts, and the rating itself counts.
I disagree ))))
Percentages count from 0 to 100. That's it. That's it.
And the rating? From how much to how much? And relative to what? We need a point of reference.
In mathematics... And in statistics?
I thought it would help somehow:
Except I don't know how to apply them properly...
By the way, according to these functions, the first line has the lowest values, although its average error is the biggest...
Everything should make sense, and you can screw anything to anything. The magnitude of deviation has nothing to do with the average - again, two parameters from which you need to draw one conclusion.
I disagree ))))
Percentages count from 0 to 100. That's it. The edge.
And the rating? From how much to how much? And relative to what? You need a point of reference.
Don't. We'll have to choose the best one,
Don't. We'll have to choose the best option,
Is this what it should look like?
Which row to choose from. How to build a ranking?
Is this what it should look like here?
Which row to choose from. How should the ranking be done?
Each column should have 1, 2, 3 (if there is the same percentage, then 1, 2). Then sum up for each row.
Is this what it should look like here?
Which row to choose from. How to build a ranking?
The lowest sum is 23, we choose the first row.
The lowest sum is 23, so we choose the first row.A good example - the first line wins despite averaging the best second line.... and the advantage is considerable, and the first line has on average the worst values. Conclusion we need to change the method....
Once again the task is to have the smallest difference between the scores of the modes with the lowest total score.....
Yes and the whole method with the ranking - it comes down to the fact that it is easier to summarize the lines - to reflect in fact the score itself.... after a while maybe divide them by the number of columns and go back to the average)))
Good afternoon! I am facing the following problem.
Tinkoff Investments has a very unfriendly terminal and it is terribly inconvenient to analyze charts there!
I cannot use those instruments (currency pairs, stocks...) in MT4 MT5 because all tinkoff instruments are pegged to the ruble!
Dear traders, a question!
is it possible to add instruments (currency pairs) available in tinkoff investments to the MT4, MT5 terminal?
to make it convenient to analyse the chart?