MT5 and speed in action - page 42
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Thanks for the information. In Benchmark.mqh you need to uncomment the top line and reverse the bottom line. So that it is like this.
Then the metering will work. Now there is a protection, that if "brakes" are detected, then do not measure.
Alertilo, until interrupted.
VPS is the cheapest, with a minimum TP. $2.99/month.
A microsecond timer has both a system error and a cost, depending on hardware, operating system and virtualization.
Which is what I wrote about earlier in this thread, that there are no brakes on Linux.
Or at least they are very minimal and not noticeable.
But for some reason my posts have been deleted. It's kind of weird.
Alertilo, until interrupted.
VPS is the cheapest, with the lowest TP. $2.99/month.
However, it's a tough case. Snapshot mechanics can only be used bypassed on such machines.
h ttps://www.mql5.com/ru/vps/best-forex-vps-technology
Please take the same measurements there.
h ttps://www.mql5.com/ru/vps/best-forex-vps-technology
I noticed the following thing, when selecting the server with the lowest ping on your service,
never offers the closest server, always around the corner.
Although previous ping measurements to other servers, I know for sure that the map showed your pps in that area is much closer.
Or is it possible to manually select provider?
However, this is a tough case. Snapshot mechanics can only be used to bypass on such machines.
Of course. For $3 there is nothing to look forward to. Such an option is only for well optimized EAs, without heavy calculations and indicators, with a small number of open positions (so far I have 6-8 positions on each of 4 terminals), with minimal use of functions accessing the server and history, not HF trading (holding time - tens of hours or days). It is enough for me. At first with 12 terminals and non-optimized code I had to spend $50 on the same VPS.
I noticed the following thing, when selecting the server with the lowest ping on your service,
never offers the closest server, always around the corner.
Although previous ping measurements to other servers, I know for sure that the map showed your pps in that area is much closer.
Or is it possible to manually select provider?
Specify the server name of the broker, please
Please do the same measurements there.
Downloaded your benchmark scripts + example.
Benchmark.mqh: TimeAvg[GetMicrosecondsCount()] = 0 mcs.Tests were done on a 2630 full terminal, and working VPS terminals are many times less resource consuming and their latencies are known to be lower.
We use workplace hosts of our VPS service.