Vim as ide for mql - page 14

 
trader_number_one:
What happened to the topic starter? Is that it, a permanent ban?
Got the caravan driver killed. The caravanner must have followed?
 
TheXpert:

Alexei Tarabanov, Artyom Trishkin, Peter Konow, Dmitry Fedoseev

Actually, a question - what have you forgotten in this thread?

Do I have to ask you where to be a moderator?
 

On this forum, unfortunately, negative selection ) And the ban is, in a sense, a sign of quality. At least if it is received from Renat ) So the boots are good, you can take them.

 
Alexey Navoykov:

On this forum, unfortunately, negative selection ) And the ban is, in a sense, a sign of quality. At least if it is received from Renat ) So the boots are good, you can take them.

You can only get a black nickname from Renat.

 
<br / translate="no">
I recommend to all Very Clever and Confident people to watch this video.

https://www.bbc.com/reel/playlist/how-to-be-smart?vpid=p08d53sb

Unfortunately it's in English only, but the Very Smart will understand.

Read about the Dunnig-Kruger effect.

 
Alexey Navoykov:

On this forum, unfortunately, there's negative selection ) And a ban is in a sense a mark of quality. At least if it is received from Renat ) So boots good, you can take.

:)

What childish naivety - not to see the list of users with a dead nickname and their merits leading to such an award, but to sing hymns to them essentially blindfolded.

To be among them is to settle into the ranks of the lowest commoner by their deeds.

Orchestra, touché!

 
Alexey Navoykov:

On this forum, unfortunately, negative selection ) And the ban is, in a sense, a mark of quality. At least if it is received from Renat ) So boots are good, you can take it.

I believe that TC was banished for excessively negative, critical rhetoric that distorts the objective reality, when in illusions of their own professionalism, he and some other specialists (and not very specialists) forgot to scold an applied language for its compliance to the standards and canons that cause its narrow focus in comparison with universal languages. Imagine a group of senile people wrinkling their noses and putting handkerchiefs in the park, condemning the tractor that rattles by the side of the road for the low comfort of its interior and the lack of an interactive control panel. Here if they were discussing efficiency, speed of operation and relevant indicators for the tractor, but no! - It occupies them that a "mechanical monster" cannot be driven quietly across golf courses without hitting holes. So, I want to tell them "Sirs, the tractor was not created for that purpose", but they will not hear it anyway, for while they argue about tractor's absurdity in a role of Mercedes, they admire their unbridled genius, thinking that they have found a successful victim and attract admirers.

Only, the "victim" does not want to be one, so they put a ban on him.

 
Реter Konow:

I believe that the ban is given to TC for excessively negative, critical rhetoric that distorts the objective reality, when in illusions of their own professionalism, he and some other specialists (and not very specialists) forgot to scold an applied language for its compliance to the standards and canons that cause its narrow focus in comparison with the universal languages. Imagine a group of senile people wrinkling their noses and putting handkerchiefs in the park, discussing a tractor that rattles by the side of the road for its low comfort and lack of an interactive control panel. Here if they were discussing efficiency, speed of operation and relevant indicators for the tractor, but no! - It occupies them that a "mechanical monster" cannot be driven quietly across golf courses without hitting holes. So, I want to tell them "Sirs, the tractor was not created for that purpose", but they will not hear it anyway, for while they argue about tractor's absurdity in a role of Mercedes, they admire their unbridled genius, thinking that they have found a successful victim and attract admirers.

Only, the "victim" doesn't want to be one, that's why it's banned.

The administration is much more aware of who came from where and why, and whose orders they fulfil under the guise of a noble knight, gathering at the same time a entourage of naive followers.

Sometimes it is the independent, but very annoying unaware of their sabotage, admiring and proud of their seeming genius, jusers who fall under such a tune.

But they continue to be sung hymns by some of the blind kittens of their entourage that they have managed to gather for themselves over the course of their activities.
They are lauded as fighters for independence, freedom and fraternity, who have fallen (in fact they have fallen) in a just and unequal struggle for "it".

All in all, it's like the reality around us. Sadly.

 
Реter Konow:

... when in illusions of their own professionalism he, and some other specialists (and not so specialists) forgot that they were scolding applied language ...

Lots of letters, but the ban wasn't about language at all. I remember his post in the discussion of the new version, which was later scrubbed. What he said was perfectly fair, just a bit emotional.
 
Alexey Navoykov:
It's a lot of letters, but it wasn't the language that got him banned. I remember his post on the new version being scrubbed. What he said was perfectly fair, just a bit emotional.

Only this one's a bit long,

About five years...

© L. Filatov. "About Fedot Streltsy..."