Need your advice on which signal to choose for subscription. - page 17

 
jori77:

Good point, is the drawdown by equity or by balance? Or maybe more importantly, how much of the drawdown is beaten back by profits)? (49% down and 549% gained and trades all closed)?

Another good question is if you trade higher risks, i.e. every trade is increasing with profit, it often happens that you get pluses, pluses, pluses, the deposit grows and the entry volume is the same, but then you get a minus in one trade and all income is lost. We have to watch that the trader trades with a standard lot (one figure is stable). This is how monitors also do it.

 

Connect, don't be shy. Good points to discuss, practical ones.

About the fixed lot and other things, what other opinions are we going to hear?
 
We realise that we have already included all this inour filter in fact. But perhaps there are valid additions?
 

We'll set a deadline: 22.11.2019 - collect opinions by the end of Friday.

Then we'll put everything in and do a summary.

We'll be shown more widely and we'll find something new for ourselves.

 
If the signal lives more than 3-5 months and during this time has given more than 100% profit, then it's not a bad indicator. withdraw your hard-earned money and continue trading without risk.
 

+ Selecting signal accounts with trades that are hovering or "oversubscribed", at most within one week (5 days, mind you, not 7) is critical. As weekends can change the picture a lot and hit the deposit sharply towards zero. Ideally, trades are closed by the end of the trading day and not during periods of increased spread

I do not agree with this point at all. Sometimes there is no movement for more than a week and a person trades not intraday. it is important how a trader hedges his trades and gets out of such situations. and the picture can be spoiled by any global news in the financial markets from one day to another. as was the case with Brit in June 2016.

 
Konstantin Evsyukov:

+ Selecting signal accounts with trades that are hovering or "over-hyped", within one week at most (5 days, remember, not 7) is critical. As weekends can change the picture a lot and hit the deposit sharply towards zero. Ideally, trades are closed by the end of the trading day and not during periods of increased spread

I do not agree with this point at all. If there is no movement for more than a week and a person does not trade intraday, it is important how a trader insures trades and gets out of such situations. and the picture can be spoiled by any global news in the financial markets from one day to another. as it was with Brit in June 2016.

Seconded. There are different trading principles and that is why there are many different trading systems and rules (not universally accepted). You can trade however you like - it is up to the subscriber to study the signal from the trading statistics and either accept the fact of a certain type of trading or look further for more suitable options.

 
Konstantin Evsyukov:

+ Selecting signal accounts with trades that are hovering or "oversubscribed", within one week maximum (5 days, mind you, not 7) is critical. As weekends can change the picture a lot and hit the deposit sharply towards zero. Ideally, trades are closed by the end of the trading day and not during periods of increased spread

I do not agree with this point at all. I do not agree with this point. it happens sometimes there is no movement for more than a week and a person trades within a day. it is important how a trader insures trades and gets out of such situations. and the picture can be spoiled by any global news in the financial markets from one day to another. as it was with Brit in June 2016.

Also I agree, the flotsam is annoying at times.

 

Personally, I believe that apart from risk management - there are no "trading criteria" really.

Our filter reduces the risks of those who plan to subscribe in the first place. The subscriber does not want to sit and watch the process (he may trade on his own and not in forex, for example or otherwise). He needs the signals as another element in his risk map ;)

Further:

If I personally am offered such signals to choose from:

Accelerator - super profits in a short period of time

Mesh dealer or portfolio specialist - equity is at the bottom (exception - the equity is much higher and almost always;)

Sniper/scalper - equity + balance is almost always equal.

investor/carry - long time holds, equity could be at the bottom

Intraday trading - trades ideas/news/patterns and deals within the day most often.

And if they pass our filter points, as I think they do (it's my responsibility to invest in who) - I'm more likely to choose a few than one.

 

Signal


Reason: