Points VS Pips - page 41
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I hope you, as a long-time member of this forum, do not need to explain what this is?
And if you don't know, I'm sorry, I won't explain it to you.
All this nonsense is enough for me, this thread. Adjus.
with a clear conscience)
As a long-time member of this forum, I hope you don't need to explain what this is?
And if you do not know, I'm sorry, I will not explain, please study it yourself.
All this nonsense is enough for me, this thread. adjus.
I see, nothing else was expected.
Baseline point
Have you yourself read or are you smoking the same magic weed as the writer of this article?
Just a sheen of miraculous thought:
But you can understand that the increase was 1% of the previous value: 10 × (100 + 1) / 100 = 10.1%.
What is the correlation?
In this case I can only advise you to learn to read and not to ask the question that has just been answered.
Fedoseyev's bullshit generator has kicked in.
Is that the best you can come up with? Or is it time for you to go to the primer too?
You know, Andrei, when you were quiet and only occasionally spewed out half a sentence, you gave the impression of being clever.
In this case I can only advise you to learn to read and not to ask the question that has just been answered.
I see, the theorist decided to teach everyone
You should get the word "understandable" out of your vocabulary, it's not compatible with your personality.
I wish you wouldn't use the word "understandable" in your vocabulary, it's not compatible with your