A man has become a billionaire. What is his purpose in life now? - page 22
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
everyone will live on a billion dollars. technologies will appear to produce cheap yachts and planes and everyone will have them).
After all, ordinary people now have a standard of living which 500 years ago was available only to kings.
And the billionaires we know, they do not live on a billion.
you can get 5% annual dividends from capital. for a billion, it is 5 million a month.
does Buffett even live on 5 million a month? he has a simple house, a used Honda, and eats at McDonald's.
the average american lives on 5,000 a month.
I don't even know how you can live on 5 million a month. what to spend the money on.
let's say everything is rented and not bought.
what kind of house can you rent for a million a month?
what kind of car can you rent for a million a month / yacht / plane? that's their full VALUE, not rent.
If the environment doesn't want more money, a person doesn't want it either. a person looks around to see how much money others have.
become a capitalist yourself.) Capitalists used to be simple people too.
oh, what bad capitalists! exploiting the working class!)
If there were no jobs, common people would have starved to death.
If you don't want to - don't work for the capitalist.
But if they disappeared altogether, where would the money for these benefits come from?
That is the way it is in the CIS. In America billionaires walk like ordinary people.
And who will decide on these allowances? a bureaucrat?
The division of society into rich and poor is a law of social development called the 20/80 law. According to this law, 20 per cent of society will become rich and 80 per cent will become poor against their will. How the rich will share with the poor is the task of the authorities, guided by justice. Mostly by progressive taxation.
The division of society into rich and poor is a law of social development called the 20/80 law. According to this law, 20 per cent of society will become rich and 80 per cent will become poor against their will. How the rich will share with the poor is the task of the authorities, guided by justice. Mostly by progressive taxation.
This is the law of organization of the social structure everywhere in the living world, but the closest herd is baboons) The main baboon (president, king)-subdominants (officials)-and the rest majority-passive (omezhki). The first 2 categories have the most life-goods - the rest are not the ones who have the most life-goods).
The division of society into rich and poor is a law of social development called the 20/80 law. According to this law, 20 per cent of society will become rich and 80 per cent will become poor against their will. How the rich will share with the poor is a task for the authorities, guided by justice. Mostly progressive taxation.
Well, that's right--the passionate minority and the sub-passionarians. It works in principle if it works at micro level and in any collective - they even try to choose an ideal ratio. Because if there is a lot of passive, there won't be any innovation. And a lot of active - explosive - no one will do the routine).
Mostly by progressive taxation.
A progressive tax is taking money away from Bill Gates, Zuckerberg, Alan Mask, who would have spent it on creating products useful to people and giving it to people who can't do anything.
A progressive tax is taking money away from Bill Gates, Zuckerberg, Alan Mask, who would have spent it on creating products that are good for people and giving it to people who can't do anything.
Disabled people and single mothers with many children are unable to feed themselves and their children. So let them die?
Disabled people and single mothers with many children are unable to feed themselves and their children. So, let them die?
I think this was mainly aimed at social benefits in capitalist countries): unemployed migrants from Africa and the like
I think it was mainly aimed at social benefits in capitalist countries): unemployed migrants from Africa and the like
I mean, principally, who are living on welfare
I mean the principals who live on welfare
not just Negroes and Arabs))
Disabled people and single mothers with many children are unable to feed themselves and their children. So, let them die?
A progressive tax is taking money away from Bill Gates, Zuckerberg, Alan Mask, who would have spent it on creating products that are good for people and giving it to people who can't do anything.
Exactly. Some people see justice in this outrage. Look, someone earns ten thousand dollars a month, someone earns ten thousand.All people are different, differently embedded in the economy, bring different benefits through their work and consequently receive different proportional to benefits (outright criminality, kickbacks and embezzlement of various budgets are not considered).
Even with a flat rate, he pays 1300,000 reais in tax and the other 1300. Is this justice? What is it? The percentages are the same? :) I think it's fair when they both pay 1300.
But fans of some alternative justice, this is not enough - a progressive scale, the "rich" not only pay more money to the poor, but the "interest". Then the gap in the amount of tax paid is even greater. Total alternative justice.
A progressive scale is not bad, only the other way round.