
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I am currently developing EAs and indicators. I used to write programs for Windows and work with three-dimensional graphics.
To study programming I don't consider nonsense. Don't attribute your fantasies to me.
How to make it easier? You can't! You either like programming and you voluntarily chew on this granite, with enthusiasm :) or take it as a bitter pill, which you do not want to take, but must. In the case of programming, you don't have to. "If painting doesn't love you, all your love for it will do nothing" https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/224131/page21#comment_6319679:) Then the only thing left to love is trading (also, provided it loves you :) ). So, the key is the feeling you get when you are doing, programming, trading, whatever. If it's not your thing, don't torture yourself, if on the contrary, go on, go deeper into it ;)
That's my point. The whole μl service has become for people like you. Developers of trading apps, with programming experience in general. You don't live by trading, you live by your applications. And if a person comes here for this particular business, they need to study the theory in depth, to become a pro at writing programs. To be competitive. Traders as a class are not mentioned at all.
Have you tried the Expert Advisor constructor?
How do you make it easier? You can't! You either like programming and you voluntarily chew on this granite, enthusiastically :) or you take it as a bitter pill that you don't want to take, but you have to. In the case of programming, you don't have to. "If painting doesn't love you, all your love for it will do nothing" https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/224131/page21#comment_6319679:) Then the only thing left to love is trading (also, provided it loves you :) ). So, the key is the feeling you get when you are doing, programming, trading, whatever. If it's not your thing, don't torture yourself, if on the contrary, go on, go deeper into it ;)
A newcomer to conventional programming might realise that he can write a game as good as Doom or WorldOfTanks. But that's no reason for a beginner to give up "Hello Word 1" in favour of learning DirectX.
I have a colleague who is a pretty smart "manual" trader, who has been trading with varying success for 10 years. It was for him that I wrote my first MQLs.
So, he wanted to study programming at least up to the level of "write an ATR indicator". He has looked through the courses, looked at the code, even tried to write something, and gave up after a week. He said, "Not for me, write everything yourself, I will tell you what exactly it is".
Well, for him it is the same whether it is MT4 or MT5. They both are mere words.
My wife, I'm sure, will say the same thing.
I have also had a few of them. I have had a few of them, they are absolutely unable to write their own programs. They have reached the level of code understanding, they say: I am not able to go further, let's stop here.
You don't live by trading, you live by your applications.
If you mean me, I study the market, you could say I live trading to some extent. But I translate all my ideas into ATSs and test them on the Expert Advisor tester. In the future I plan to join traders for creating joint projectors, when I finish working on my ideas.
Have you tried the expert constructor?
That's a direct lie. Take away the codebase or the articles and learning is already complicated. Add them and a textbook, and learning becomes easier. So this parameter can be managed to a certain extent, if you're willing. So you are lying.
Who removed the Codebase or the articles? I think everything is in place. What are you making up? :)
There is so much information on the Internet that is enough for any beginner, if he only wants to do something in MQL or trading.
Forum on trading, automated trading systems and testing trading strategies
MT5 is a terminal for programmers, not for traders
fxsaber, 2018.01.09 17:55
Do I get it right that if MQL5 could be coded in the same way as MQL4, the questions of high complexity of MQL5 would not arise?The answer was yes! Expect similar decisions.
Who took away the Codebase or the articles? Everything's in place, isn't it? What are you making up? :)