How do you feel about the riskiest trading strategy, namely unwinding the deposit. - page 3

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
If you can't say anything on the subject, don't flub.
In my opinion, everyone here has spoken out purely on point.
People here have long since passed this dubious step. Casino games are interesting, of course, but they very rarely end in winnings. That's why such reviews.
And in my opinion, everyone here has spoken out purely on point.
People here have long since passed this dubious step. Casino games are interesting, of course, but they very rarely end in winnings. That's why the reviews are so good.
Well, if there's no money, that's how they raise the deposit. Once you lose, twice you lose, on the third time you open the deposit and then stop - you start trading with low risk and with all the finer points of MM.
Show me at least one such statement.
That's not usually how people "raise" a depot.
Once you lose, twice you lose, three times you lose and you abandon this dirty business.
It's a lucky trade. You can do it in a casino, there's no difference.
How do you feel about the riskiest trading strategy, namely the promotion of the deposit with maximum risk.
This is an aggressive style of trading using scalping, hedging, locks.
I would like to know traders' opinions, both those with a lot of trading experience and those just starting out.
And also interested to know if you would sign up for the signal or maybe become an investor of such a trader,
if you know you can lose your deposit
And in my opinion, everyone here has spoken out purely on point.
People here have long since passed this dubious step. Casino games are interesting, of course, but they very rarely end in winnings. That's why the reviews are so good.
Is this even a strategy? Or just a set of words?
The risk does not depend on the size of the deposit. The risk depends only on the trader's literacy, the right timing of opening a position and its direction. What is called a drawdown is ALREADY lost money, and the deposit will not refund it retroactively. Your money is not your balance, your money is your equity. Therefore, we can rephrase the well-known proverb: a strong deposit does not need a big one, while a weak one will not benefit from it. Accordingly, the term "deposit promotion" is not something out of the ordinary - it is the purpose of the trade. The deposit is all the money I have earned, until I withdraw it.
I respect your opinion. I respect your opinion. The only thing is that every cent you have deposited should automatically be considered as lost and not as a drawdown because drawdown can be converted into profit and a closed order into a drawdown, no.) And the risk on orders should really be calculated from the balance and the current drawdown, if any. You may not open an order with 10.00 lots if you have $20 on your balance. You may play any market situation in your favour. And about deposit unwinding I do not agree with you, because it implies a multiple increase in a short period of time. 700% per week - is unwinding and 50% per year is trading and very conservative. Do not try to confuse the concepts.
At the moment I set myself a goal to increase 10% of my balance per day and this is a normal trade for me personally with not a big risk. I am not a robot, I am wrong. My personal record in this crazy venture was like this: 100$ deposit after 3 days on a balance of 740 in two days 1400 in the end of course a complete drain. At the moment I slowed down and 10% a day on average is good enough for me. And for someone and it is insanely risky trading ))))