From theory to practice - page 894
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Well, we're writing in the engine thread.) It's true that he gets his kicks)) Never mind... Movement is life.)
It's a pretty cool thread, readable. It lacks openness, but no one expects it anymore. They catch the hints and are happy with that.
In fact, of course, this branch was not originally intended to be a one-actor theatre.
The intention was that it would develop open source codes, literature and parallel research. Unfortunately, this didn't happen and I can't explain why it did.
Most likely, it's confusion in the minds of suffering people, that was made by very old people like Asaulenko and Bas, who not only doesn't want to tell anything under the pretext of "Money like silence" (as if they have it :) How can the deep old people have money? - I don't understand...), but also diligently divert the subject to nowhere.
And now - what's there is what's there. Just a place to talk. Whatever.
In fact, of course, this branch was not originally intended to be a one-actor theatre.
The intention was that it would develop open source codes, literature and parallel research. Unfortunately, this didn't happen and I can't explain why it did.
Most likely, it's confusion in the minds of suffering people, that was made by very old people like Asaulenko and Bas, who not only doesn't want to tell anything under the pretext of "Money like silence" (as if they have it :) How can the deep old people have money? - I don't understand...), but also diligently divert the subject to nowhere.
And now - what's there is what's there. Just a place to talk. So what.
You can put the blame on others if openness is not enough to have a really open dialogue. The topic is relevant and there is activity in it.
Dialogue is difficult because of your arrogant disrespectful attitude towards your opponents.
It is possible to put the blame on others if there is not enough openness to have a really open dialogue. The topic is relevant and there is activity in it.
The dialogue is difficult because of your arrogant disrespectful attitude towards your opponents.
All right. I could stay silent - but then this thread will simply disappear, as in the'Create trading robot' thread.
Take the initiative - create your own thread, you wanted to. However, the trouble is that its fate will be the same. I can't explain this phenomenon, but I want to be wrong.
Try it.
Okay. I could keep quiet - but then this thread would simply disappear, just as the"Creating a trading robot" thread disappeared.
Take the initiative - create your own thread, you wanted to. However, the trouble is that its fate will be the same. I can't explain this phenomenon, but I want to be wrong.
Try me.
There are unwritten laws in nature. The crowd follows the leader.
You call after you and there is no need to be silent.
It doesn't cost me any trouble to bring up a topic and move it indefinitely, but I don't need to.
And in the"creating a trading robot" thread, there was no real host. As a "member of the crowd" I'm not interested in promoting myself as a leader, although several people have suggested it. I have enough knowledge and experience, but some bits of new knowledge will never be unnecessary to me.
I will consider your suggestion.
Now that we've gone back in time a little bit... Neo's words from the spider come to mind (not verbatim) .... "I look at all this and one word comes to mind.... sentiment' )))))
Yeah, well.
In fact, people want more from others than they want to share their own.
Greed is inherent in human nature.
Everybody wants to eat.
Ack Schurik is complaining about leaky pockets. And money doesn't go into leaky pockets. It's also a mystery of nature.)