From theory to practice - page 1218

 
aleger:
It's debatable, you can do without it
Yes, you can...
 
Renat Akhtyamov:
Yes, you can...
It is better (more logical) to use the concept of a composite trend
 
aleger:
It is better (more logical) to use the concept of a compound trend

The main thing is to make it work.

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

The main thing is to make it work.

That's for sure. The main thing is not to miss anything and not to get confused when making basic definitions (especially of the compound spread)
 
Renat Akhtyamov:

The main thing is to make it work.


Why did you delete the signals? I guess it didn't work, did it?

What about the Forum on every corner?)

 
Evgeniy Chumakov:


Why did you delete the signals? Apparently it didn't work if it did?

What about the Forum on every corner ?))

The corners went round.)

 
Guys, who's got what?)
Honestly, share already...)
It's definitely not alcohol...
 

Here, the sample is fixed, but not constant in time.

The formula for channel variance was discussed in the first pages D = Sqrt(c * lambda * t)

 
Evgeniy Chumakov:

Here, the sample is fixed, but not constant in time.

The formula for channel variance was discussed in the first pages D = Sqrt(c * lambda * t)

This is (in the figure) anything but the variance (hundred).
 
Yuriy Asaulenko:
It is (in the figure) anything but a variance (hundred).
which figure. ?
Reason: