From theory to practice - page 1188

 

Doc's last post on my PM, after which he made his feet off this forum (I hope he's not offended for posting it):

"My current research summary is this - thinning is a good thing.
The purpose of thinning for me is not to get gamma in returns or erlang in time. It's about making the time series more predictable. As always, when generating features for a model, the most important thing is to have some consistency in the features in relation to the target.
Since the last week or so I managed to trade neuronics on a thinned series without using indicators at all, so I have a practical proof. I can explain how it works and give an example code, but most of it is written in mixture of R and C++. And the mql robot itself only reads neuron weights and predicts by them and trades, so everything is complicated and confusing."

Naturally, I declined the explanations and the code, and now I'm biting my elbows...
 
Alexander_K:

Doc's last post on my PM, after which he made his feet off this forum (I hope he's not offended for posting it):

"My current research summary is this - thinning is a good thing.
The purpose of thinning for me is not to get gamma in returns or erlang in time. It's about making the time series more predictable. As always, when generating features for a model, the most important thing is to have some consistency in the features in relation to the target.
Since the last week or so I managed to trade neuronics on a thinned series without using indicators at all, so I have a practical proof. I can explain how it works and give an example code, but most of it is written in mixture of R and C++. And the mql robot itself only reads neuron weights and predicts by them and trades, so everything is complicated and confusing."

Naturally, I refused the explanations and the code, and now I'm biting my elbows...

i do not understand what he means by a thinned series and how he developed it, but i do not think that this is the only grail

you can tell from his handwriting that either you spoke to him superficially or he writes like that for children on purpose. "it's complicated and confusing" - an attempt to steer away from the simple meaning of the strategy, to confuse

 
Maxim Dmitrievsky:

I'm not quite sure what his definition of a thinned row is and how he mastered it, but I don't think that's the only grail.

you can tell from his handwriting that either you spoke to him superficially or he wrote it on purpose as if it were for children. "it's complicated and confusing" is an attempt to take away from the simple meaning of strategy, to confuse

hmmm. But, it was after this post that he disappeared without a trace. Maybe he was also hacked off by investors? Does that mean that everyone who came out to the grail will be hacked? However!

 
Alexander_K:

hmm. But, it was after this message that he disappeared without a trace. Maybe the investors got rid of him, too. Does that mean that everyone who goes to the Grail is going to get hacked? However!

Maybe he took out a quick-money loan at too high an interest rate of 3% a day and was unable to pay it back in time... but all in all it does not seem that the grail he found silences people forever... or is it?

 
Maxim Dmitrievsky:

maybe took out a loan at too high an interest rate of 3% a day at fast money and couldn't pay it back on time, sucked it up... but all in all it's not like finding the grail silences people forever... or does it?

I don't know, Max. The way I see it, people don't know themselves until they get into emergency situations. There is no telling how we will behave if we do find the grail (and we will). I can't say anything.

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

no

the price has two options

+ и -

more often -

and all movements are not random

Here, try to explain the reason for the impulse (although it's already drawn):


if you know the answer, you don't have to tell me, I'll assume you know.

So, where did you find the MA-scheme here, eh?

I've already said it before: no process to the letter L)

 
Alexander_K:

:))) Nope. It is from a thirst to sip from the holy cup.

That currency pairs are interlinked is an axiom that needs no proof. But how?!

I recall Wizard saying that when he prepares input data for his TS, he uses a combination of several currencies and time.

He seems to possess the coveted formulae and hides them in his woods...

Three cards! Three cards! Three cards! ...queen, seven, ace. The important thing is not to go crazy, like Herman.)

 
Martin Cheguevara:

I've said it before: lack of an L process)

No. It'sstatistically speaking.

and what actually happens is deleted.

You know, I've told you more than enough.

There are no other options or explanations.
 
Enough with the self-defeating and the abstruse formulas. The only grail on forks is filtering ppms on anomalies. And on those anomalies enter to return to ppms. But anomalies that are stable on a long history give no more than 40-60% p.a.
 
Alexander_K:

That's very little, Marx. That's nothing at all... This thread is looking for the Grail, not a shameful +5% per month. Stay out of the way - go look for Engels.

Bro, I've been looking for a grail since 2003. And I'm not happy with the results of less than 20% per month myself, but it can't be helped. My trading robots have been analyzing the market from beginning to end for market inefficiencies, and all they say is the same - the maximum is given to us, that is, transactions on abnormal movements, towards balance, with take and stop not less than spread*30 (otherwise it's more profitable to go to the casino). Sad, but true. Seldom but well - that's our division.
Reason: